Search results

This is key. For the proponents of gun control no risk is acceptable, no utility is acceptable. Gun regulations in 2014 had achieved a degree of stability and social consensus. The LPC and Poly have destroyed that consensus, if was not lawful owners that did that. There always is an...

You are fixated on capability as determined by risk vs utility. Okay, what technical components increase risk? How are we defining risk? Risk to what? How do we manage risk? What are the mechanisms by which we can mitigate risk? Ie licensing vs banning. How are defining utility? Utility to...

In the Poly documents they explicitly state that just because a rifle is used for hunting does not make it a hunting rifle. However they do not ever define what they mean by hunting rifle.

Gun control in Canada largely starts and ends with Poly and a few others adjacent. It’s not an issue for most. Some of Polys thoughts in their own words; Policy document https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/SECU/Brief/BR12228832/br-external/PolySeSouvient-e.pdf ATIP’d Government...

That would require a Liberal Party that is not ideologically captured by the pro gun control elements and would be willing to listen. The government would need to think along the below lines.

So a definition of nonsensical understandings that gets ignored by its very drafters cannot be much of a useful thing.

One of the concerns that the gun control advocates have with internationally legitimate shooting sports is that they help make the participants proficient. No one on the gun control side in Canada has offered a technical description of “more”. It’s just “assault style”, which is emotional...

You are aware of the current and previous regulations in Canada right? Your post indicates some gaps. A bolt action rifle has no barrel length restrictions only the overall lengths apply. A bolt action rifle has zero magazine capacity restrictions, you can have as many as you want.

Someone needs to articulate what specific technical characteristic is too much for civilian ownership. Otherwise there is nothing to debate other than emotional feelings.

I don’t believe @Jarnhamar thinks the problem will go away. Rather it’s the only way society at large will realize that they have been fed disinformation by charlatans to their and their societies detriment.

Canada has never made firearms laws or regulations in the last 40 years based off capability. The decisions were made on disinformation.

What upgrades and technology from the CMAR should be prohibited for civilians? The automatic capability has already been for decades. The CMAR RoF is no higher than the C7 and in practical terms is no more than any semi automatic action type. Is it the free float barrel that’s objectionable...

If you’re arguing about magazines or action types you are losing. Gun control is in effect now driven by political extremism. It needs to be countered as such. Decisions need to be inclusive in their making. The rule of law must be adhered to. Winner take all outcomes need to be avoided...

I wonder if the Aussie police have found any social media activity or documentation etc that offers insight into how, why and where these people became radicalized to this extent?

If you think gun control, in any country but particularly the UK, Canada and Australia, is governed by reason and logic I have some ocean front property in Saskatchewan to sell you. There is no logic, reason, consistency just emotional feelings and desires. Most of the prominent gun control...

This proposal should be raising alarm bells, as horrific as the attack was, the idea that you can have your rights/privileges curtailed by actions of those three removed from you is concerning. This statement from the NSW Premier is interesting. It is only slightly removed from the thought of...

Australia’s political leaders seem to have decided on their policy reaction. Restricting firearms ownership to citizens is reasonable perhaps. It’s interesting that the authorities won’t state the shooters country of origin...

Here’s what the Premier of NSW and NSW Police Commissioner are talking about. Here's the latest from the NSW government. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-15/bondi-beach-shooting-terrorist-attack/106142446

Potential ISIS connection identified by Australian authorities. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-15/bondi-beach-attack-gunmen-father-and-son/106142630

Of course. I have read that once disarmed the one shooter retreated to the bridge covered by fire from the other shooter (that was the gunfire that impacted the brave bystander I think). Once at the bridge the disarmed shooter rearmed himself with another weapon and the two continued on. Have...