- Reaction score
- 2,737
- Points
- 1,090
every gun the Liberals have banned in the last 5 yrs or so that was NR was or could be depending on caliber a hunting gun

Also keep in mind The Mosque shooters high capacity semi-automatic rifle jammed before he got inside the mosque and he had to switch to his Glock 19 pistol, which is what he used to shoot everyone with. No one was killed with the rifle.
Not "too"- "more". "More" is quantifiable, observable. "More" is the advantages that other factors can mitigate, that make them optimal for warfare, that provide offensive parity against Opfor (Contextually -LEO's)
Yes, of course.I'm assuming there's a "don't" missing?
Optimal for warfare like the Mosque shooters rifle jamming and him having to run around with a pistol.Not "too"- "more". "More" is quantifiable, observable. "More" is the advantages that other factors can mitigate, that make them optimal for warfare, that provide offensive parity against Opfor (Contextually -LEO's)
IKnowNothing said:To be clear - I'm not in favor of the bans.
technically c-21 established a definition- which future OIC's promptly ignoredNo one on the gun control side in Canada has offered a technical description of “more”. It’s just “assault style”, which is emotional gibberish.
technically c-21 established a definition- which future OIC's promptly ignored
To a more effective lobby group it would be a great jump off point to anchor the debate to set standard and prevent scope creep, erroneous classifications etc.So a definition of nonsensical understandings that gets ignored by its very drafters cannot be much of a useful thing.
technically c-21 established a definition- which future OIC's promptly ignored
That would require a Liberal Party that is not ideologically captured by the pro gun control elements and would be willing to listen.To a more effective lobby group it would be a great jump off point to anchor the debate to set standard and prevent scope creep, erroneous classifications etc.
Decisions need to be inclusive in their making.
The rule of law must be adhered to.
Winner take all outcomes need to be avoided.
Education and critical thinking need to emphasized.
Misperceptions need to be countered.
I have to admit, I have trouble reconciling the last two with a viewpoint that would tacitly agree with an SME opinion about the quality of tools having an impact on the outcome and LEO response while steadfastly refusing to allow such an opinion any place in the public discourse.The government would need to think along the below lines.
Some tools make anyone a little better. Other tools make some people a lot better.I have to admit, I have trouble reconciling the last two with a viewpoint that would tacitly agree with an SME opinion about the quality of tools having an impact on the outcome and LEO response while steadfastly refusing to allow such an opinion any place in the public discourse.
You mean two psychopaths very publicly killed a bunch of Jews.That was before "fudd guns" very publicly killed a bunch of Jews.
Huh. I thought they banned all semi-autos. I see now it was just "assault style" weapons which includes a lot (if not most) semi autos. And that Celik Arms Chimera looks even more Assault Style then the Brownings! (It's name even makes it sound like an assault rifle)
Browning BAR and Benelli R1 not long before they are banned too
this list also shows you what the bans have done. Eviscerated the firearm retail sector
And hence the handgun ban.100% it could have.
A 308 could also go through a body at close range into another.
Also keep in mind The Mosque shooters high capacity semi-automatic rifle jammed before he got inside the mosque and he had to switch to his Glock 19 pistol, which is what he used to shoot everyone with. No one was killed with the rifle.
6 fatalities with a pistol. What if he had a shotgun with 5-7 rounds that could fire a big slug or OO Buck shooting 8 lead pellets per shot (or 15 per if he's using 3&1/2" shells)
Someone needs to articulate what specific technical characteristic is too much for civilian ownership. Otherwise there is nothing to debate other than emotional feelings.