The full time component of the CA PRes … to get around TB established PY limits and create more full time battalions than can be done with authorized Reg F numbers.
The text is clear on the requirements being triggered when the prohibited circumstance is in the present.
So, again, you don’t have to go retroactively reporting all your past relationships. You do have to report a past relationship if and when prohibited circumstances exist in the present...
It means you need to disclose if you suddenly find yourself as the supervisor of your ex. You don’t have to report every past relationship relationship if there is no relevant circumstance today.
https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-military-strikes-iranian-boats-missile-launch-sites-centcom-2026-05-25/
"U.S. Central Command continues to defend our forces while using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire," said Navy Captain Tim Hawkins, a Central Command...
If you need to start your post with a condescending swipe any person who may come to disagree with you, you maybe need to find a happy place and look after whatever is haunting you.
When looking for a question to fit your answer, somethings are not even worth a fit test. Trump’s assault in Canada/US relations is not something you are going to solve with a modified CA orbat … regardless of its elegance.
And in this case you are proposing we created a new division HQ (for...
Don’t we have a whole thread discussing the current US administration’s caustic behaviours toward Canada where the last two and a quarter pages would better fit?
This would do absolutely nothing for Canada. Doesn’t fit any national strategy. Doesn’t earn “international relations points” with a president who doesn’t care about allies. Doesn’t support our commitments to NATO. Doesn’t please voters who will see it as an act of servitude.
With his northern imperial ambitions seemingly deterred by NATO and the stock market, he turns his interest back south … seemingly unconcerned about how his base will react to adding 30 million Spanish speakers to the national population.
Yes, the case can be made that the military does not require a professional disciplinary system and an employer disciplinary system because there is only one employer. A professional disciplinary system is done in public whereas employer disciplinary systems are typically done behind closed...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.