Search results

You belong to a support base. Ask your ULO, likely they will do the same thing they do for the unit's in your area. Either through a pre-arranged contract or via CF52 (minor claim)

I listen to that podcast and then the news broke that the deal fell apart. I was like that aged like milk. Looking forward to the next iteration that's for sure

Pretty sure canning SQ was a CA internal decision not pressure from purple folks. Bringing back SQ does noting for purple folks. It isn't part of their DP training, so like SQ the CA is going to have to get purp folks up to speed upon posting in to a CA position Facts, or align them the same...

I have seen that pack list it is good stuff. There are similar variations floating around the CA, I say variations as beyond an annual generic L1 list of approved items to buy for each Op LENTUS season, each Div did their own thing. Often driven based on the what the provinces provided for any...

Checked it out yesterday, $20 bucks for the day is an amazing deal. Had a few brews while my wife double flipped her way to beating me in almost every game.

There are lots of online auto auctions. The GC surplus one has lots at times

It is an excellent change, much needed for something that hasn't been updated in 20+ years. Now they just need to align the RegF plan with something as simple and elegant.

They are always a welcome break....just never enough in the system

This is a larger issue than "printed forms" as it involves almost anything that needs to be printed. This includes what people in this thread are thinking of when it comes to printed forms but more importantly things like field message pads, stickers, warning labels and many more. Essentially...

Yes that is what I meant for sizzle.

I mean we did exactly that so yes...but please no. Please no

Agreed. My other hope is we get out of huge one off buys and just continually upgrade the fleets over time.

As long as you're showing back up to RMC with all the right leave burnt, it shouldn't be an issue to them and really they have no authority if you're properly attached posted. However, if you're getting short leave and not burning all your annual leave that you need to burn during the summer...

Agreed. Worth clarifying though DRMIS is not CGCS. CGCS displays material master data but it's not pulling it live from DRMIS/SAP. They mirror each other in what you see, but they're distinct systems. As for pictures, DRMIS/SAP can technically hold images attached to a material master record...

The messaging was lost in this one. The NCR return is specifically aimed at getting folks who are not entitled to kit to return it.

We finally found a use for it. OFC the most useful version for this type of thing is the one we bought the least of.

While time will tell, this was intended very much to be a short term solution while a better semi-permanent camp is built.

This thread is definitely taking a sidetrack from Latvia, but there is a trial going on with something very similar to what you're mentioning where the the claimant just uploads all the stuff. Not sure how it's going but folks are thinking the right way anyway

I still remember the QMSI signed me up for a NPF deduction for my sash so I can be awarded one upon my promotion. Was very clear that I was happy to pay for my own sash. I didn't understand why my pay was deducted without my permission but everybody whitewashed it.

Mandatory high level requirement: able to fire on the move - specifically in complex terrain while inverted (no not a typo).