Search results

66% falling to 58% is a pretty big drop, and that metric still predates his war in Iran, the fight with the Pope, and Jesus memes. Surely he would have made some better life choices in the past two months if he were hoping to appeal to Christians.

The article supporting your premise will be one year old this month. The data that article is built from is even older. I would not use it to conclude that he still has that support despite many antics through the past year.

We will waste a lot if everything is rebranded every time government switches between parties. We are on this path now. Don’t need to go back.

https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/themes/defence/caf/identity-system/badges/command/canadian-army-badge.png

The IVI mark is GD-OTS Canada.

For @Kirkhill https://news.sky.com/story/we-have-to-get-ready-for-large-scale-conflicts-says-canadas-military-chief-13530556

Go fill your gas tank now.

That's a lot of BS*. *Technical term defined here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2631787720929704

That is the sense of "have to" in your statement: So again, Trump may be the first time where the world took notice when he proposed buying Greenland while the US had an obligation to defend it, but Trump has been the only president to propose buying Greenland while the US has an obligation to...

Yes, but not at some point in time where there was a US obligation to defend Greenland, as you alluded. Nor (as you also alluded) were previous proposals about the US feeling allies needed to do more (as the alliance did not yet exist).

Trolls prefer tolls on bridges.

No other president has offered to buy Greenland since before the Cold War & creation of NATO.

That doesn’t really contribute anything to the topic of CA Reserve restructure.

I don’t see any confirmation that Iran has also agreed to a ceasefire…

It’s a lot more palatable for European nations to resume striking Houthis in response to a Houthi choice to resume strikes on commercial shipping. Global democracies already supported that fight, and it can be sold domestically as a continuance of that fight.

What's old is new?

Wonder when we will get the list of “who” that goes with this.

Why? There once were different aptitude tests. It had the impact of sometimes requiring pers to write multiple tests if they were interested in occupations not covered by the same test, or CAF members writing new aptitude tests to OT or commission. Put all the questions in one test and get a...