True. However, I can just as easily replace "effective logisitics" with "effective combat troops" and the quote would still ring true.
So, we established that we NEED both. Without security you cannot conduct your logisitics and vice-versa.
But the problem being stated here is we tried to...
Support staff dont win wars or hold ground. Combat troops do.
I never meant to slag supprt staff/logistics. Every military needs them...and I mean that, we NEED them. But they will not "win" the war.
As for the figures and where I got them, the figures are drawn from that article/book. If...
I have to agree. The problem wasnt with the individual Canadian troops. They wanted to fight. The problem is the lack of aggression and risk adverse nature of some of our leadership. Argue what you want, but its true. We are very much a logistics-based army. Too many pencil-pushers, not...
Probably no more than the average 20 year old political science student though. The problem is the arrogance of "been there, know it all". And yes, I have been there multiple times
Fair enough, life goes on. I just think units like that have a more difficult time filling their ranks if a lot of guys decide to "retire" before the move. Im sure they considered that as a factor though...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.