Search results

This thread is definitely taking a sidetrack from Latvia, but there is a trial going on with something very similar to what you're mentioning where the the claimant just uploads all the stuff. Not sure how it's going but folks are thinking the right way anyway

I still remember the QMSI signed me up for a NPF deduction for my sash so I can be awarded one upon my promotion. Was very clear that I was happy to pay for my own sash. I didn't understand why my pay was deducted without my permission but everybody whitewashed it.

Mandatory high level requirement: able to fire on the move - specifically in complex terrain while inverted (no not a typo).

I suspect our inability to think at divisional and theater sustainment levels are going to make these orgs clones of their Bde counter parts. Hope to be wrong.

One problem that has arisen lately is an L1 or an element of one will do something like this but forget they need to utilize stock or resources that is managed/controlled by another L1. BMQ is a great example as it uses a large amount of army field kit to achieve its aims. If there is no...

We very poorly employed them in Afghanistan. My personal opinion is they are just a tool in the toolbox and I rather we focus on AT at the Sect and Pl level rather than trying to make sniper lite folks

Latest BOOTFORGEN has been released. COMBAT BOOT REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM CANFORGEN 011/26 ADM(MAT) 02/26 191920Z JAN 26 Key changes: Increase from 340 to 450 Deployment duration of 5+ months removed and replaced with deployed on named mission" They must be Brown Slightly more detailed on RCAF...

Lots of ok options at Carling, overpriced a bit but I can get a fair facsimile of a Donaire so it is all good

It is legislative so needs parliament to change the rules. Sounds like good way for the government to continue their support to the CAF by making the changes. In a dream world the legislation would be changed so anyone that hits the gateways to access the money can do so regardless if they...

All good, I have the right contacts to ask for the ground truth anyway :)

Hmmm will follow up with the folks I know (OC and SNCOs/WOs that run CSS orgs) and the CA G4 maint team but in general those are not concerns that have heard before. Not saying they don't exist just anecdotal is not always evidence. In any case if there are issues, while I can't help much, am...

Besides the size I haven't heard too much about the SMP being disliked from RegF CSS side of the house. It is a pretty capable vehicle if huge AF

Good point: Here is the email address @Booter and anyone else should use: [email protected]

I can't find any thing in the SEM policy page likely because the issuance of promissory notes are under review. It does seem that as of 31 Jan 2025 anyone with releasing with oblig service needs to pay it all at once at release. I couldn't find any updated policy at all just the contents of an...

Meh SAP/DRMIS is world class. We have an older version but still used by umpteen thousands of companies. Our problem is more self induced. When we switched over to an erp system that is a whole ecosystem, we tried to recreate all our s***** prior systems that stood alone and the people doing...

Any material can have multiple manufacturer part numbers associated with it in our cataloguing system. More complex than that but the capability is there and is used.

Yea I saw the whole exchange. It is a nothing burger. Environment doesn't play an issue for LogO we largely stay within environment. Other RCLS trades maybe have different employment patterns but that is usually NCMS but that is a different conversation.

You are fiddling to nothing. No RCN Log O is working in the the CA less a few (mostly purplish) exceptions. There is larger issue of logistics folks being spread among environments but officers are largely exempt but CA LOgO are CA DEU

They have moved back to trg in Borden.

There is no posting allowance associated with a IPR move or local move https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/compensation-benefits-instructions/chapter-208-relocation-benefits.html#sec-208-849 208.992(5) (No Entitlement) There is no entitlement to...