- Reaction score
- 6,284
- Points
- 1,040
I would say yes; they keep putting up leaders with dubious competence or very punchable and then wonder why they lose. I actually thought O'Toole was pretty good but was trying to please all the wings of the party while still being electable. That's an impossible task, as some of the fringe elements have stances that make the leader political kryptonite.
I think some house cleaning is needed to ever get electable; they may lose members to the PPC or whatever, but right now they are alienating the majority of the centre who have no interest in going back to the 1950s, and just want to be able to pay their bills without the country falling apart.
I don't want to vote for either at this point, but there isn't any non-lunatic middle ground smaller parties in my area, and the NDP and Green party candidates seem to be whoever has a pulse that wants their name on a placard instead of someone who would actually be a competent MP if elected.
I think some house cleaning is needed to ever get electable; they may lose members to the PPC or whatever, but right now they are alienating the majority of the centre who have no interest in going back to the 1950s, and just want to be able to pay their bills without the country falling apart.
I don't want to vote for either at this point, but there isn't any non-lunatic middle ground smaller parties in my area, and the NDP and Green party candidates seem to be whoever has a pulse that wants their name on a placard instead of someone who would actually be a competent MP if elected.