• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

$60 / Barrel by year end

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any price rebound signals will encourage a flood of new production from the US, not to mention cash starved states like Russia and Iran. The invisible hand will wrestle these guys to the ground:

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/04/15/oils-price-collapse-is-quickly-draining-petrostate-coffers/

Oil’s Price Collapse Is Quickly Draining Petrostate Coffers

The petrostates assembling in Doha to discuss a potential output freeze two days from now aren’t coming together in a show of solidarity or out of some sense of duty towards one another, but rather as an act of desperation. Bloomberg ran the numbers, and found that the oil price collapse has collectively cost the 18 countries involved in this meeting nearly one third of a trillion dollars:

The 18 nations set to gather in Doha on Sunday to discuss a production freeze have spent $315 billion of their foreign-exchange reserves — about a fifth of their total — since the oil slump started in November 2014, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In the last three months of 2015, reserves fell nearly $54 billion, the largest quarterly drop since the crisis started. […]

Saudi Arabia accounts for nearly half of the decline in foreign-exchange reserves among oil producers, with $138 billion — or 23 percent of its total — followed by Russia, Algeria, Libya and Nigeria. In the final three months of last year, Saudi Arabia burned through $38.1 billion, the biggest quarterly reduction in data going back to 1962. […]

“We expect 2016 to be yet another painful year for most of the oil states,” said Abhishek Deshpande, oil analyst at Natixis SA in London.
$315 billion is an enormous sum, and it represents the cost of OPEC’s Saudi-led plan not to cut production at any point during oil’s period of sliding prices these past 22 months. Until this February, this seemed like a price Saudi Arabia was willing to pay—though it’s been paying it dearly. Now, though, the Saudis are finally looking to coordinate production with other petrostates, spurred on by the speed at which their rainy day fund is being depleted.

And with Riyadh ready to play ball, there’s not much more in the way of a deal to limit output…except for Tehran, which is looking to boost its own production to the levels it was posting before Western sanctions were enacted. Iran is one of many reasons why this Doha meeting looks unlikely to produce the sort of price rebound those 18 assembled nations really want, but Bloomberg’s data give us a better idea of why these petrostates are finally trying something.
 
Meanwhile, back in the USA:

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/04/18/us-energy-consumption-nearly-eclipsed-by-surging-production/

HAIL SHALE
US Energy Consumption Nearly Eclipsed by Surging Production

2015 was another big year for American energy, as for the sixth straight time the sum total of our production grew—and came quite close to equalling the amount of energy we consumed. The EIA reports:

[E]nergy production reached a record 89 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu), equivalent to 91% of total U.S. energy consumption. Liquid fuels production drove the increase, with an 8% increase for crude oil and a 9% increase for natural gas plant liquids. Natural gas production also increased 5%. These gains more than offset a 10% decline in coal production. […]

U.S. primary energy net imports declined for the 10th consecutive year. Imports rose 2%, but that increase was outpaced by a 6% increase in exports. Petroleum products accounted for 71% of U.S. primary energy exports. […]

After increasing in 2013 and 2014, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption fell by 2% in 2015. An increase in natural gas used for power generation, largely replacing coal, was the primary reason for this decrease, as natural gas is less carbon-intensive than coal.
It’s important to caveat this achievement, though. The fact that the amount of energy we produce is nearing the amount we consume does not mean that we’re close to being able to wall ourselves off from global energy markets. Take oil as an example. The shale boom has boosted our crude production by 40 percent in a matter of years, but even if we were able to drill more than we require, we would still import and export plenty of oil—producers will look to sell their cargoes wherever they can fetch the best price, and the oil market is a particularly global and liquid one. Energy independence, therefore, is something of a myth.

But the effect the shale boom is having on our collective energy security is undeniable, and it ought to be getting credit for the economic and geopolitical boon it has been.
 
Saudi Targets

The Saudi price war has several targets. A top official hinted at the hierarchy a month ago, listing Iran, Russia, the Arctic, Canada’s oil sands, Venezuela’s Orinoco tar, ultra-deep water wells, US shale, and renewables, in that order.

Saudi ability to prosecute the offensive

Saudi Arabia is not as rich as often supposed. Per capita income is the same as in Greece.  Standard & Poor’s has cut its credit rating twice to A-, and for good reason. The Saudis never built up a proper sovereign wealth fund in good times. Their reserve coverage is two-thirds less than in Kuwait, or Abu Dhabi.

End game?

Goldman Sachs says the twin effect of rising demand and supply disruptions across the world is bringing the market back into balance, leading  to a “sustainable deficit” as soon as the third quarter. The inflexion point could come sooner than almost anybody expects if a strike this week in Kuwait drags on as oil workers fight pay cuts. The outage is already costing 1.6m b/d.

Kuwait’s woes are the first taste of how difficult it will be for the petro-sheikhdoms to impose austerity measures or threaten the cradle-to-grave social contracts that keep a lid on dissent across the Gulf.

And Russia can't get access to the fracking technology due to sanctions.


Canada's best play?  Pipelines.





Saudis are going for the kill but the oil market is turning anyway

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard 18 APRIL 2016 • 9:17PM

Russia is a key undeclared target of Saudi Arabia's oil price war

The collapse of OPEC talks with Russia over the weekend makes absolutely no difference to the balance of supply and demand in the global oil markets. The putative freeze in crude output was political eyewash.

Hardly any country in the OPEC cartel is capable of producing more oil. Several are failed states, or sliding into political crises.

Russia is milking a final burst of production before the depleting pre-Soviet wells of Western Siberia go into slow run-off. Sanctions have stymied its efforts to develop new fields or kick-start shale fracking in the Bazhenov basin. 

Saudi Arabia’s hard-nosed decision to break ranks with its Gulf allies at the meeting in Doha - and with every other OPEC country  - punctures any remaining illusion that there is still a regulating structure in global oil industry. It told us that the cartel no longer exists in any meaningful sense. Beyond that it was irrelevant.

Hedge funds were clearly caught off guard by the outcome since net ‘long’ positions on the futures markets were trading at a record high going into the meeting. Brent crude plunged 7pc to $41 a barrel in early Asian trading, but what is more revealing is how quickly prices recovered.

Market dynamics are changing fast. Output is slipping all over the place: in China, Latin America, Kazakhstan, Algeria, the North Sea. The US shale industry has rolled over, though it has taken far longer than the Saudis expected when they first flooded the market in November 2014. The US Energy Department expects total US output to drop to 8.6m barrels per day (b/d) this year from 9.4m last year.

China is filling up the new sites of its strategic petroleum reserves at a record pace. Its oil imports have jumped to 8m b/d this year from 6.7m in 2015, soaking up a large part of the global glut.  Some is rotating back out again as diesel: most is being consumed in China.

Goldman Sachs says the twin effect of rising demand and supply disruptions across the world is bringing the market back into balance, leading  to a “sustainable deficit” as soon as the third quarter. The inflexion point could come sooner than almost anybody expects if a strike this week in Kuwait drags on as oil workers fight pay cuts. The outage is already costing 1.6m b/d.

Kuwait’s woes are the first taste of how difficult it will be for the petro-sheikhdoms to impose austerity measures or threaten the cradle-to-grave social contracts that keep a lid on dissent across the Gulf.

There is little doubt that Mohammad bin Salman, the deputy-crown prince and de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, wanted an excuse to sabotage the Doha deal. He added a fresh demand that non-OPEC Norway should also limit output – a non-starter -  as well as hardening the Saudi objection to Iran’s full return to pre-sanctions output.

The calculus is that his country has the deepest pockets and will ultimately stand to gain by shaking out weaker players.  This is a gamble. Saudi Arabia is running through $10bn of foreign exchange reserves a month to plug its fiscal deficit. The fixed riyal peg makes it much harder to roll with the budgetary punches as Russia is able to do with the floating rouble.

Saudi Arabia is not as rich as often supposed. Per capita income is the same as in Greece.  Standard & Poor’s has cut its credit rating twice to A-, and for good reason. The Saudis never built up a proper sovereign wealth fund in good times. Their reserve coverage is two-thirds less than in Kuwait, or Abu Dhabi.

The Saudi price war has several targets. A top official hinted at the hierarchy a month ago, listing Iran, Russia, the Arctic, Canada’s oil sands, Venezuela’s Orinoco tar, ultra-deep water wells, US shale, and renewables, in that order.

The primary foe is obviously Iran, the leader of Shia Islam and arch-rival for strategic dominance of the Middle East.  The two countries are at daggers drawn in Syria, Yemen, and Iraq.

Many suspect that the secondary undeclared foe is Russia, currently the world’s top producer at 10.8m b/d but short of money and running down its infrastructure. The Kremlin will exhaust its budget reserve funds by the end of the year, forcing Vladimir Putin to contemplate draconian budget cuts. The Saudis may think it worth going for the kill by trying to hold down prices for a few more months.

The trouble for the Saudis is that their strategy has probably killed OPEC – the instrument that leverages their global power – and may set fire to their own strategic neighbourhood, if it has not done so already.

Helima Croft from RBC Capital Markets has raised the bank’s stress gauge for “geopolitical risk” on six OPEC countries, warning that several are on a precipice. “Many were struggling with political and security challenges when oil was above $100 and they are now being forced to seek emergency lending,” she said.

OPEC
Most OPEC states are deeply underwater at current oil prices

Venezuela has already collapsed.  It is on a four-day working week. Inflation is 700pc. Nicolas Maduro’s regime is running out of money to pay oil workers. It risks a repeat of the strikes in 2002/03 that cut oil production by 80pc.  Without Chinese funding it faces a “humanitarian catastrophe” this year, she said.

Angola has slashed spending by 15pc of GDP and even so it has been forced to go cap-in-hand to the International Monetary Fund after vowing that it would never do so.

Nigeria has lost 390,000 b/d in output due to a wave of assaults by militants since the Buhari regime ran out of protection money  to pay them off. These included a sophisticated underwater attack on a Shell pipeline at the Forcados terminal.

Iraq is supposed to be the great hope of global oil supply over next decade but is in no better shape. The collapse in revenues has set off a vicious circle, with delayed payments to contractors leading to an investment strike. It too is in the arms of the IMF.

ISIS terrorists set fire to oil wells in the Khabbaz field near Kirkuk last week.  Suicide bombers struck in Basra early this month, and terrorist actions are moving ominously close to the Iraqi crown jewel, the Rumaila oil installations. Security officials say ISIS is targeting the oil heartland, yet the government is so desperate for funds that it cannot pay vitally-need Shia militia groups.

In Libya, ISIS has gained a foothold in the heart of the oil region around Sirte. It has vowed to ignite rebellion in Algeria, another state spiraling into financial crisis. Most of the Maghreb is now a powder keg.

Any one of these countries could spin out of control. It is not far-fetched to imagine two or three occurring at the same time. This would change the dynamics of the oil markets in a heartbeat and would bring the ageing post-Lehman expansion of the global economy to an abrupt halt, exposing the nasty pathologies that have been building up.

It never was cheap oil that threatened our economies. The scare earlier this year was misguided. It is the next oil supply crunch we should fear most.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/18/saudis-are-going-for-the-kill-but-the-oil-market-is-turning-anyw/
 
Chris Pook said:
...Canada's best play?  Pipelines.

East, West, or North; it remains to be seen which direction ends up being the 'least unacceptable'.

:pop:
 
From Mar 7 2016

http://business.financialpost.com/news/energy/canada-has-a-secret-weapon-in-the-war-to-crush-saudi-arabia-for-market-share-clean-oil?__lsa=0a9f-0229

Saudi needs an oil price of 95.80 USD/Barrel to keep the country running.

Alberta can limp by with prices in the 40 to 60 USD/Barrel range.

Operating Cost in Saudi 11.35 USD/Barrel
Operating Cost in the oilsands  18.45 USD/Barrel in 2015

Operating Costs in the oilsands dropping below 12.00 USD/Barrel at some sites.

CNRL quoting costs of 9.59 USD/Barrel and 6.75 USD/Barrel

Similar changes are being seen in Shale Oil apparently.

And this doesn't include the fact that Canada grows trees and grain with the CO2 it produces, trees that grow on top of recovered oilsands mines.  Not so many trees in Saudi or the Gulf.








 
They can paint trees on all the LAV's we sell them. Hate to say it, but if KSA falls into financial crisis, Iran will do its best to worsen the wounds. Nothing would make Tehran happier than Riyadh in turmoil, perhaps even combined with fighting an insurgency of growing proportions the ruling family will destabilize. What goes around, comes around....
 
The Saudi's might try to stir up the Balchs against their Persian masters in return
 
Husky predicting operating costs of $7/Barrel at Lloydminster extraction site .


Operating costs at Husky’s new thermal project in Saskatchewan are among the lowest in the industry, according to the Calgary-based company.

Husky announced today its new 10,000-bbls/day Edam East Lloyd Thermal Project in Saskatchewan is expected to average about $7 per barrel, including energy, in the last quarter of 2015.

http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2016/04/husky-thermal-oil-project-operating-costs-at-8-dollars-per-barrel/
 
Wow, I didn't think KSA's production costs were so high...ouch! ;D

...or that oil sands was getting so low! :nod:
 
Regardless of the production cost and the cost per barrel, and regardless of the Alberta government, there will be little to no fiscal discipline.  It's the Alberta Advantage.
 
dapaterson said:
Regardless of the production cost and the cost per barrel, and regardless of the Alberta government, there will be little to no fiscal discipline.  It's the Alberta Advantage.

Not to worry.  We always seem to be able to find some spare change to send your way. 
 
From my contact in the patch, without the pipelines to get the shit out, it's more or less a moot point.
 
They're still shipping by rail JJT - and that cost goes down as the price of diesel goes down.

Having said that pipelines are cheaper.  And hybrid solutions are possible - build pipelines where they are allowed and jump the gaps with rail.  For example more rail cars going through Burnaby and Montreal.
 
Chris Pook said:
Having said that pipelines are cheaper.  And hybrid solutions are possible - build pipelines where they are allowed and jump the gaps with rail.  For example more rail cars going through Burnaby and Montreal.

...but apparently that's okay, because it's higher probability and greater consequence if things go wrong.  Oh, wait....
 
We have a smaller version of the same issue here in Vancouver, YVR fuel delivery

http://www.vancouverairportfuel.ca/project-need-benefits

meanwhile those that oppose all http://www.vaporbc.com/
 
Colin P said:
...meanwhile those that oppose all http://www.vaporbc.com/

:o  Heretics!  Pipelines are evil!

Dolphins carrying fuel in saddle bags is safer and more sustainable, so long as the dolphins don't push the bags with their snout, there shouldn't be any impact to wildlife...perhaps Orcas for greater capacity?

[/sarccasm]
 
So, to summarize the Vancouver environmentalist community's position:

They want a pipeline from the Chevron refinery to Vancouver Airport to supply fuel to the planes they need to jet off to conferences and snow-boarding but they don't want a pipeline to supply fuel to the refinery.

I guess the fuel from the refinery comes the same way that meat gets to the grocery store

12804762_969203656448504_6182866544720000608_n.jpg
 
It's hard for them to see clearly through the haze of pot smoke.

I suggested at one point instead of pipelines we build a dedicated track and line it with tank cars all connected to each other from refinery to terminal. How about instead of "pipeline" a underground railway built into a artificial tunnel to contain any potential spills.
 
Related thought Colin.

At the Canada-US border where the XL pipelines were to join - insert a 1 mile circular loop of track.  Fill in Canada.  Empty in the US.
Problem solved.  No restrictions on shipping oil across the border by rail.

 
yep and I also have previously suggested to others in government the pipeline/rail idea. Seem thinking out of the box is frowned upon....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top