midget-boyd91
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 230
Whatever happened to having a cell phone that was just that... a phone? One without all the gizmos and gadgets with laser beams and coffee machines built into them.
PMedMoe said:Geez, I don't even have a cell phone. I hate people calling me at home, let alone anywhere else!
I know, I'm such a dinosaur!!![]()
geo said:heh.... Sergeant Major is always a favorite ?
uncle-midget-clause said:Whatever happened to having a cell phone that was just that... a phone? One without all the gizmos and gadgets with laser beams and coffee machines built into them.
Sheerin said:...
Cell phone companies have us by the balls... and they know it.
D Squared said:I did, however, have to add a data plan (nothing is free, I may be old but I'm not totally clueless) in order to take full advantage of this awesome smart phone. First 3 months are unlimited usage and I'll be monitoring those 1st statements closely, too much wireless Army.ca and I'll be in the same boat as our $85K buddy.
Bell sued over N.W.T 911 charges
JORGE BARRERA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CANWEST NEWS SERVICE A Yellowknife man has launched a $6-million class-action lawsuit against Bell Mobility for charging 75 cents per month for 911 emergency call services that don’t exist in the Northwest Territories. The lawsuit, filed Nov. 29 in N.W.T. Supreme Court, also seeks to force Bell Mobility to release information mapping out the areas in Canada that receive Bell coverage but do not have 911 services. James Anderson, 55, said Bell makes enough money and should not charge customers for things they can’t use. “What Bell Mobility is doing is not fair,” said Anderson, a former school superintendent based out of Inuvik, N.W.T. “The fact they have knowingly done this — charged for services they are not providing — is irksome.” Anderson hopes others across the country in the same predicament will join the class action lawsuit, which still needs to be certified. None of the lawsuit’s allegations have been proven in court. The statement of claim says Bell Mobility has “behaved with arrogance and high-handedness, has shown a callous disregard and complete lack of care . . . and ought to be punished and deterred from future misconduct.” It goes on to state that Bell’s “conduct was sufficiently harsh, vindictive, reprehensible and malicious.”