Instead of PA staff to counterspin a three month old think piece, there may be some valid recommendations in the original report that the story discusses. But then, when the original report was introduced to this forum for discussion back in July (same time frame as the piece referenced) it didn't generate any great dissection.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.