Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 8,847
- Points
- 1,040
Just flip the script and put Trump's son or son-in-law in the same position.
Sure, but who is arguing that here? My position has long been that there aren't any grand conspiracies; there are just motivated people using their position and authority. Political appointees are usually not apolitical.To argue that this was some sort of grand fix put in by the White House is nonsense.
You could easily drop some Trump family into that equation too.Sure, but who is arguing that here? My position has long been that there aren't any grand conspiracies; there are just motivated people using their position and authority. Political appointees are usually not apolitical.
To get a straightforward "customary" handling of Hunter Biden's misdeeds, the people pulling on threads would have to be confident none of the threads would unravel Joe Biden. As long as no-one can firmly and plausibly deny that companies owned by Biden family members have received millions of dollars from foreigners, or equally strongly explain what it is those companies and the Biden family members do that is worth that kind of money, people who don't know the truth have to wonder about what happens if they dig.
Jared Kushner, certainly. Democrats want an investigation into his Saudi Arabian connections. That's politically difficult unless an investigation into Hunter's Ukrainian and Chinese connections is pursued with equal vigour. I doubt any Democrats are willing to trade an investigation that probably ends with Jared for one that might not end until it reaches Joe.You could easily drop some Trump family into that equation too.
I don’t honestly think that Democrats will need to do that. I suspect that JK will get run down his father in law’s bus on the Secrets for Sale tour…Jared Kushner, certainly. Democrats want an investigation into his Saudi Arabian connections. That's politically difficult unless an investigation into Hunter's Ukrainian and Chinese connections is pursued with equal vigour. I doubt any Democrats are willing to trade an investigation that probably ends with Jared for one that might not end until it reaches Joe.
He clearly sold some Pardons at the end, so no I don’t think that is past him at this point.There is no doubt 45's handling of material labelled with classification markings raises concerns, but do you really think he was selling the USA's most sensitive secrets to the biggest bidder? Come on...
Would have never happened. Trumps would have called the procecutor and pardon is son.Just flip the script and put Trump's son or son-in-law in the same position.
Not necessarily. Trump basically instructed everyone to co-operate with Mueller's investigation, after all.Would have never happened. Trumps would have called the procecutor and pardon is son.
Pure TDS.Would have never happened. Trumps would have called the procecutor and pardon is son.
Welcome back. Have you read the indictment yet?Pure TDS.
That’s supposed to be evidence subject to protection from disclosure. Someone needs to quit dicking around and let the justice system do it’s thing unimpeded by leaks.
To be faaaaair, he hasn’t contradicted himself. Trump’s alleged crimes took place after his administration, and he’s very definitely not above the law with thirty seven title 18 felony charges going to court.