Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado continues to impress with her intellect, and her sober grounding in reality…
Seems to have the issue well in hand (sorry, couldn’t resist) …Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado continues to impress with her intellect, and her sober grounding in reality…
The best thing the Dems could hope for is to have her out more doing more things.Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado continues to impress with her intellect, and her sober grounding in reality…
I see this isn't the only place that needs a sarcasm emoji.Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado continues to impress with her intellect, and her sober grounding in reality…
I’m not sure she’s being sarcastic.I see this isn't the only place that needs a sarcasm emoji.
Are you channeling Morning Joe, CNN or The ViewI’m not sure she’s being sarcastic.
She doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to saying wacky stuff; she’s spent too much time in Congress LARPing as a box of rocks. She had a firm grip on some things, but reality isn’t among them.I see this isn't the only place that needs a sarcasm emoji.
She has literally made the demand three times today. This isn’t her joking or being sarcastic, nor is it ‘us vs them’, it’s just Boebert sidling up to an already low bar of expectations and still finding room to squirm under. But it’s indicative of the sort of bad faith that comes even from congressional representatives… In a thread about America’s fracture, it’s topical.She doesn't need the benefit of doubt. I was reading it, as an adult with a sense of humour, so I knew where she was coming from.
But, I'm getting drawn back in to what I was trying to avoid. The Us versus Them attitude of this thread. Outta here.
That’s one read. Up to the sender of the message to be clear, not up to millions of receivers to be clairvoyant and “knowing”what is meant. That goes for comms on all sides, this narrative included.She doesn't need the benefit of doubt. I was reading it, as an adult with a sense of humour, so I knew where she was coming from.
Whos the Us and the Them?She doesn't need the benefit of doubt. I was reading it, as an adult with a sense of humour, so I knew where she was coming from.
But, I'm getting drawn back in to what I was trying to avoid. The Us versus Them attitude of this thread. Outta here.
Hey, cmon now, a box of rocks could at least hold something down or act as ballast, which is useful. She's spare parts at best, and is actively wasting oxygen plants did some hard work making.She doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to saying wacky stuff; she’s spent too much time in Congress LARPing as a box of rocks. She had a firm grip on some things, but reality isn’t among them.
From the same people who thought Biden was perfectly fine until 5 minutes ago.She doesn't need the benefit of doubt. I was reading it, as an adult with a sense of humour, so I knew where she was coming from.
But, I'm getting drawn back in to what I was trying to avoid. The Us versus Them attitude of this thread. Outta here.
No, most people here were less than enthusiastic about Biden. Both candidates were see as unfit.From the same people who thought Biden was perfectly fine until 5 minutes ago.
Not really no. But it certainly reinforced and increased the existing view.Who were then "shocked" by his debate performance.
Pretend? Not sure what you are getting at. Until things turned on him, it looked like he was staying on. Plenty enough were saying he was too old or unfit.And pretend now not to have foreseen his inevitable dropping out of the race.
Really, like what?You'd think the benefit of anonymity and the threat of ridicule would make folks a bit more honest. Guess not. No surprise then, that for two pages, all they've had on offer is personal attacks against someone they've never met.
Especially since the vast, vast majority of folks in this forum don’t live in the US.Whos the Us and the Them?
Hey I’m in the room.Especially since the vast, vast majority of folks in this forum don’t live in the US.
It’s one thing to debate American politics, but unless you live there then “us” and “them” aren’t really valid terms.
Imagine thinking this is the 1800s.Especially since the vast, vast majority of folks in this forum don’t live in the US.
It’s one thing to debate American politics, but unless you live there then “us” and “them” aren’t really valid terms.