;D
You're going to preach tolerance now. I find that ironic given your initial post in this thread.
We don't judge on spelling and grammar here unless a message is so poorly phrased and typed that it is unreadable. And Ghost was obviously writing in response to a recent "problem child" that invaded our little haven of good sense and shared information. I think we are all quite protective of the image this site desires to portray, and as for "second hand experience" - that's great - posting info from books and movies is fine, if they are considered respectable works of value. I for one am tired of seeing George C. Scott quotes posted as Patton quotes because they saw Scott say something in the movie. A quote from Carlos d'Este or Ladislas Farago or Martin Blumenson, three of his "official" biographers, would carry so much more weight, don't you think?
Mister Moore's works are so bound by controversy - and bear in mind that his movie, unlike a scholarly work on the subject, has no footnotes or references - that they are of little value in aiding materially to a discussion simply because no one has any idea what was made up and what wasn't. For a look at his methodology, do a google search on "Bowling for Columbine" and read some of the online criticisms of this earlier work of Moore's. Entertaining, thought-provoking yes, it certainly was. As a reference for serious study, 'fraid not.