• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

America’s New Bomb Threat

cupper

Army.ca Veteran
Inactive
Reaction score
4
Points
430
Could make for an interesting commute in the future.

America’s New Bomb Threat

Some of the deadliest weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan—improvised explosive devices, or IEDs—are heading to U.S. shores, warns a top general.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/13/america-s-new-bomb-threat.html

According to Lt. Gen. Michael Barbero, head of the military’s Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, some of the same terrorists who amassed the know-how on building IEDs are setting their sites on the U.S.

“Today’s IEDs are relatively simple, low-tech devices, which routinely use command wire, pressure plates, or radio-controlled triggers,” Barbero wrote in written testimony released Thursday ahead of a closed hearing of a subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee. “Many readily available components such as cellphones, agricultural fertilizers and simple electronic transmitters and receivers have legitimate commercial uses, but are easily and increasingly adapted for illicit purposes in manufacturing IEDs.”

Barbero cited the case of an Iraqi named Waad Ramadan Alwan who moved to Kentucky in 2009 after winning a visa as a political refugee. According to a December 16, 2011, plea agreement, Alwan was an Iraqi insurgent working between 2003 and 2006 to plant IEDs on roads traveled by U.S. troops. In 2010, in Bowling Green, Ken., Alwan began to train another man in how to make them, making diagrams of the bombs and giving oral instructions on how to assemble the devices, according to the document.

In his testimony, Barbero said the military provided key intelligence to the FBI in the Alwan case. He said their cooperation was an example of weapons technical intelligence, a process of identifying the markings of signatures of explosives and matching with other kinds of data, working to neutralize a threat.
 
This is nothing new. The means has always been here.

ANFO, the Anarchist Cookbook, etc.

People have been making those explosives here for years.

Most, just haven't been employing them in a terrorist way.
 
recceguy said:
This is nothing new. The means has always been here.

True, but we have been giving the small guy a break.  Thank goodness they are small... very small.
 
recceguy said:
Tim McVeigh?

Not so much.

Not sure if he falls in the small guy category.

But he is an example of what can go wrong.
 
An IED is just a tool just like a gun is a tool. There is no threat anywhere from IED's on their own. Threats come from people or groups that are willing to employ IED's. I don't really see how there is anything new in this story. There have been pipe bomb attacks by home grown terrorists before and Oklahoma City.
 
I think what is new is that they are talking about it as a potential threat in the homeland. Up until now, complacency has been the standard mood, because (other than Oklahoma which was a lot more than an IED and 9/11) there haven't been any really significant successful incidents. We've had two plots that were well under way, or failed in execution, and many more that were caught early in the planning (or were lead by government plants inside).

When the average American has the attention span of a fish, most of those preempted attacks disappear from the public psyche within the 24 hour news cycle, or when the next celebrity runs afoul of the law, whichever comes first.
 
Oh I get it. The point I am making is the IED's do not pose any threat to anyone unless they are being used by a group against the "homeland".

Having read the article I'm not really sure what he is trying to get at other then people may use IED's against us. Also, I don't see how this is a new threat. There was the shoe bomber, the underwear bomber, the Toronto 16 or whatever they were called, etc. Just because these IED's were discovered before they were activated does not mean they weren't IED's. Still nothing new here in my view.

Bottom line for me, either the story should be "terrorist activity rise likely" or something to that point. Focusing on the means of destruction is the wrong way of going about this. We don't define conventional enemies and our strategies based around their weapons so why would we do so with unconventional threats.

War is about people, not technology or tools. We will never defeat IED's, we MAY be able to defeat the people that would wield them.
 
jeffb said:
Oh I get it. The point I am making is the IED's do not pose any threat to anyone unless they are being used by a group against the "homeland".

All those naturally occuring IED's, or the ones built by collectors or used for sport are fine.  :sarcasm:

IED's are made for only one purpose.

Having read the article I'm not really sure what he is trying to get at other then people may use IED's against us.

According to the article, they are trying to train "home grown" terrorists in their construction and use. If this is a credible threat, starting to educate the populace early is better than late.. For instance, "If you see some guys digging on the road, don't just turn a blind eye." is an example.

War is about people, not technology or tools. We will never defeat IED's, we MAY be able to defeat the people that would wield them.

Since its unlikely the "people" will take out billboards or carry neon signs, we need to try to catch them before they act. The more people who are on the look out, the better. As I said, educate people what to watch for.
 
Back
Top