- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 210
MagieNoire said:No offense but I can see by a few of your replies, you don't have a full idea beyond what your favorite source has told you to believe.
Ok, try not watching farenheight 9/11 for a whole week alright?
I live here, and mister, I fully understand and can see what is happening. Our govenment is using the terrorist situation as a shield to do as they please.
Can you provide some examples?
They're already to go slicing and dicing our constitution. It's what they do. The Patriot Act. Do you really believe a sound, self thinking American supports this? Proably. We're just a bunch whatever stupid sarcastic name you place upon us. Little by little, Americans are buying the farm. Little by little, they're willing to give up civil rights and freedoms, so they can feel safe.
Is feeling safe a bad thing? Yes, individuals have rights and those should be upheld but the society also has rights that supercede individual rights in some circumstances IMHO. Anything related to national security and preventing another 9/11 is certainly worth the inconvienence.
Yeah, so they can feel safe sitting pigging down their super sized meal in front of ignorant reality television. Most of them, don't even know who the Speaker of the House is, but they support him. They support, The Patriot Act. This is just one aspect. There are more. It might not sound like much to you, you're Canadian, but to an American whose paying attention, the freakin' writing is on the wall. So, go ahead and answer with more of the same.
Do they need to know who the speaker of the house is to make a desicion? IIRC it is the vice-president correct? if so then yes, they would support him because he obviously got the votes neccesary to have the job. You bring up the patriot act; I believe it is a good thing, what is so bad about giving information to the gov't in regards to national security? I assume you would call 911 if you saw someone getting mugged on the street, so why not do the same thing on an international level. It is an invasion of privacy in some cases but not an undue one. BTW, what are those "other aspects"
It doesn't speak well of your site, as I haven't insulted you but go ahead.
It dosent speak well of this site because the members here don;t agree with your views on Bush?