- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 410
For those interested in this subject, here are two conflicting reports on the subject:
http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/media/pdf/safety_rev.pdf
Detailed Safety Review of Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed 22 February 2005
by the US Army Medical command.
In Summary, they claim it's safe while referencing CFMG documents to support their argument.
and;
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-gulf-review-minutes.pdf
Review of Research Related to Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses
by the UK Military Health Research Advisory Group.
In Summary, they claim there is a link between who got sick and who got immunized while referencing
CFMG documents to support their argument.
http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/media/pdf/safety_rev.pdf
Detailed Safety Review of Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed 22 February 2005
by the US Army Medical command.
In Summary, they claim it's safe while referencing CFMG documents to support their argument.
and;
http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-gulf-review-minutes.pdf
Review of Research Related to Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses
by the UK Military Health Research Advisory Group.
In Summary, they claim there is a link between who got sick and who got immunized while referencing
CFMG documents to support their argument.

