- Reaction score
- 1,025
- Points
- 1,160
AOR Replacement & the Joint Support Ship (Merged Threads)
- Thread starter Ex-Dragoon
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
Rotomax got 54 containers as spares and have returned at least one to flight status, of the 6 they bought. They aren’t giving any to Ukraine because they are going to generate revenue with them.
At least 6 went to museums. One of ours was airworthy when we got it, it’s still got oil and hydraulic. We realized a few weeks ago it still had it’s battery installed.
We insisted on divesting some that didn’t have to be.
Again, the airframes and drivetrains for the most part were in good shape; the avionics were expensive to maintain because they were, on the whole, old. The wiring was ok, it was redid in the late ‘80s
- Reaction score
- 27,315
- Points
- 1,090
428 is at one of the gates to the new NDHQ complex at Carling and Moodie.
- Reaction score
- 16,958
- Points
- 1,010
They are still all at Rotormaxx…
- Reaction score
- 16,958
- Points
- 1,010
Maxman1
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,539
- Points
- 1,160
Sort of. We were going to procure a larger fleet of much better helicopters, the AgustaWestland EH101 (since renamed AW101) for both maritime and SAR, but the Chretien government canceled it for no rhyme or reason, then bought the same helicopter anyway for SAR after a fatal crash of one of the old Labraours, then changed the specifications to exclude the AW101 as the Sea King replacement out of pride and/or spite.
Swampbuggy
Full Member
- Reaction score
- 180
- Points
- 530
I’m there fairly often and I love to see it. It, along with the semi recent addition of IRO bow, draws a lot of interest from people who see them. I’d like to think they give people a little more incentive to learn more about the military.
- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
This really belongs in the 148 thread...
I'm not sure I agree with your sentiments, as it doesn't match what I experienced in the community.
The number of Cyclones matched the cancelled maritime variant of the EH101, 28. It had been lowered from 35 prior to Chretien coming into power. My understanding was that 35 included extras for attrition, whereas 28 was the minimum number. The number was based on 2 in the screen, 6 in the task group, 2 task groups, extra single decks, training, heavy maintenance; we reviewed that after the cancellation and came up with the same answer.
I don't know it is a "much better" helicopter. It is certainly bigger and heavier, and has the third engine. Whether that is good for small ships I'm not sure. We did gain the tail ramp (by luck, not planning; it wasn't spec'd therefore EH didn't include it) which in my opinion is excellent.
There was a reason for the cancellation... they were too expensive. It was easy to target them because we were asking for the most advanced maritime helicopter in the world with the accompanying price tag, with the mission avionics developed from the ground up. Why did Canada need that (there is a story to that which I'm working on capturing at the museum)? And why, after being told no Cadillacs, did the admirals and generals end saying a couple of years ago "best maritime helicopter in the world" (which it is, on paper) (until the problems with sustainment, readiness, training, etc became more apparent).
What specifications were changed to exclude the 101 and when? We reviewed the MHRS (maritime helicopter requirement specification) twice at the Wing around 2000, and I don't recall that. We were briefed numerous times prior to contract award by all contenders (EH101, Cougar, and S-92). EH was represented by a certain ex CO-423 who now likes to make statements to the media right to the end.
I think what happened is that EH saw the writing on the wall and bid what it would cost to develop the best. Sikorsky / GD bid what they thought would be the "least cost compliant" (it was a running jock from 2004-08 in development meetings, until it wasn't). Therefore Sikorsky won; that "Cadillac helicopter on a Buick price" has led us (in my opinion) directly where we are now (Sikorsky thought they could recoup their lost cash from development in sustainment, DND and PW begs to differ).
If you have information I'm missing I'd love to have it. The true story is yet to be written, but we're trying.
- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
I don't disagree.
I'm not sure how the RCAF or the RCN are going to regen if they keep doing the same things they always have though. Besides the obvious needed influx of money (competitive pay commensurate with the conditions of service solves a lot of recruitment and retention issues), both need to actually take the time to regen. It's hard to do that for the RCN and MH with the pressures to keep pushing ships out the door.
Hence the idea of using the Mistrals as a training platform. Put the resources in them to create lots of people, even if it meant putting CPFs on the wall and doing less deployments. It wasn't just me or MH types that were thinking that way...
Doesn't matter, water under the bridge. All these discussions are irrelevant at this point, we just need to get on with the current plan (maybe use some of the AOPS as training platforms?). I just hope they manage the transition to the AORs and CSCs correctly.
By the way, the same argument could be made at this point about cancelling the AORs (keep the leased capability, even if it isn't what we want, and increase it to 2), and 3 of the CSCs (we only have 12 CPFs, so why do we need 15 CSCs). I don't agree with it, but it could be made. Let's hope the press doesn't make the connection.
- Reaction score
- 6,270
- Points
- 1,040
- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
Both the Americans and the British do that….
- Reaction score
- 16,958
- Points
- 1,010
- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
I understand that, but I’m not sure the Canadian public knows, cares, or ever will care.
I’ve always been confused about the concept of the CTG post Cold War . In large part the CTG developed as a convoy escort force. We are the only navy I know of that has the concept of a CTG with nothing meanful at the center of it.
You said a few weeks ago that maybe what our allies need is tanker capacity. Maybe more tankers, no flag ship, one escort for each?
The CTG supposedly suppers the defence policy, which hasn’t been mean fully updated in years.
Are we chasing our tail.
- Reaction score
- 16,958
- Points
- 1,010
- Reaction score
- 1,025
- Points
- 1,160
Yes that's an option I hope they will do and keep it a government ship. The first tanker is staying on the West Coast and they have greater personnel shortfalls than the EC.
- Reaction score
- 6,270
- Points
- 1,040
That calculation is a fantasy though in reality, with no credible way to actually crew that or resources and infrastructure for the maintenance or training at that level. None of our schools have the capacity to train that many people in general, so even with CSC specific trainers our DC schools and fleet schools are already tapped at a fraction of the throughput required for that fleet size.
I'm not sure if they are sticking with it to be able to absorb cuts, but if they actually deliver them all we'll have a number of jetty queens with angry duty watches and maintenance to keep them mothballed.
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 15,401
- Points
- 1,260
Politics. He didn't like the fact that the CAF was going after new choppers - "Cadillac elicopters" so he cancelled them.
think of all the social programs the cancellation fees could have funded - a half billion dollars. There are other here far more qualified and informed than I am on this subject though.
- Reaction score
- 1,836
- Points
- 1,260
Now known as the 'Antiques Roadshow.'
- Reaction score
- 1,836
- Points
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 1,999
- Points
- 1,160
Edit: looks less me this was done last year.
marss.com
Looks like Federal Fleet is equipping Asterix with CUAS system.
MARSS moves into Canada, as Federal Fleet Services obtains NiDAR for installation on Asterix
MARSS moves into Canada as Federal Fleet Services purchased NiDAR for installation on Asterix, providing at-sea support services for the Royal Canadian Navy.
Looks like Federal Fleet is equipping Asterix with CUAS system.
Last edited:
Similar threads
