- Reaction score
- 360
- Points
- 1,410
Due to popular demand, I have set up an Army.ca Wiki, available here:
http://army.ca/wiki
Some important things to note:
Thanks to everyone who participates, I hope we can have a very successful collaborative effort here. If successful, this could be a significant resource, and I'm hoping an example of how to do a wiki "properly."
http://army.ca/wiki
Some important things to note:
- A wiki is a collaborative web tool which allows any user to edit or contribute information. Wikipedia is the most popular example of a wiki.
- I have not done any "style" work yet, so the wiki uses the default (white) style, not the Army.ca green everyone is used to. I will continue to work on this in tandem with the trial, but for now there is no header menu, etc.
- I have not pre-filled any info. The wiki is currently a blank slate, so it may be challenging to get some "momentum" initially. Please feel free to start new sections if you have information that is of general interest. Items may be edited, moved or deleted as necessary.
- A quick guide on how to edit wiki pages can be found here.
- Please provide feedback on usage, layout, format etc.
- Things are very "rough" right now, but I wanted to get the wiki ball rolling while there was still some interest rather than wile away people's patience while I work out the details. Please bear with me through the process.
- Users must log in using their forum username/password.
- Users must have 10 posts and 3 hours online in order to contribute to the wiki. If you do not meet these criteria, you will get an "invalid password" message. These requirements are subject to change, based on how well or poorly the trial works out. Anyone who pads their post count to gain access will have their posts deleted and may be banned, as with the chat room.
- The Army.ca Conduct Guidelines apply in full effect to the wiki. All edits are logged, along with your username.
Thanks to everyone who participates, I hope we can have a very successful collaborative effort here. If successful, this could be a significant resource, and I'm hoping an example of how to do a wiki "properly."

