• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

BGen Ménard relieved of Afganistan Comd & other fall-outs

The company, which employs 45,000 workers in several related companies in Canada and around the globe, says on its website that it puts "integrity first."

Read more: http://www.canada.com/news/Disgraced+Canadian+army+officer+resurfaces+Kabul/6186078/story.html#ixzz1n3W7ChrM
Makes one go hmmmm seeing as their new employee was hammered for a lack of integrity.
 
jollyjacktar said:
Makes one go hmmmm seeing as their new employee was hammered for a lack of integrity.

Not the first one. Remember this guy :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Boyle

He went to work for Boeing a few months after his resignation.
 
CDN Aviator said:
Your not aloud to be rite twise in won tred.

Did I wander into the recruiting threads?
 
CDN Aviator said:
Not the first one. Remember this guy :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Boyle

He went to work for Boeing a few months after his resignation.
I remember that boil.  Did not know that he landed on his feet smelling like dough.  :mad:
 
Figures that would turn up as a Merc sucking re-building money away from the mission
 
Jim Seggie said:
HEY!!! I was right! How about that!!!

hr02885_brokenrecord.jpg


>:D
 
Menard was convicted of violating military rules regarding misconduct because of his affair with a young woman and of the arguably more serious charge of trying to impede a military investigation into that misconduct by lying twice to investigators and encouraging the woman to do the same. He was fined $7,000 and busted in rank to colonel. He could have been dismissed from the army but he had already resigned his commission before his trial began.

That being the case, why does it make him a scumbag for finding other work in what he knows? He's gone from the CF, did you think he wouldn't find work?
 
One wonders:

1.  What Garda's frat rules are;
2.  Whether he will be armed, and with what; and
3.  What he will do this time.
 
I just want to know what the hell we would officially call the ex-General ex-Colonel guy who resigned his commission now?

I have no doubt that his job consists of riding a desk there.  ;)
 
ArmyVern said:
I just want to know what the hell we would officially call the ex-General ex-Colonel guy who resigned his commission now?
Mister?
 
ArmyVern said:
Isn't a single guy a "Master"??  8)

Until they reach puberty, then only by design........... ;D
 
Rifleman62: Reply #287 on: July 27, 2011, 08:50:09

Quote: Referred to as "Loser".

Who do lots of people watch on TV every week night, has scads of money, is loved by the Lefties, is married with young children, and has had sex with several female employees (subordinates) of his company?

Not much was said, written, reported after it was revealed. A bit, but not much. Of course he apologized. Don't know if he found God or not.

To modernize the old phrase "There is a Law for the Rich and a Law for the Poor", to "There is no Law for the Left, and Laws for the Right".


 
GAP said:
That being the case, why does it make him a scumbag for finding other work in what he knows? He's gone from the CF, did you think he wouldn't find work?

Agreed.  He wasn't found guilty of being a person who couldn't make timely decisions under the presence of an armed enemy, or that he couldn't stomach the tedious war-like environment.  If garda thinks he can be an asset, why bash him or them?  He got a little too close to a subordinate and got caught, doesn't make him a bad assest, it makes him a person who was caught in a position he wasn't supposed to be in. No more, no less.

Good on him for finding work where he was, obviously, very good at. Less the improper conduct with the people who worked for him.
 
frank1515 said:
He got a little too close to a subordinate and got caught, doesn't make him a bad assest, it makes him a person who was caught in a position he wasn't supposed to be in. No more, no less .... Less the improper conduct with the people who worked for him.
Not to rub salt in the wound, but he also mishandled a weapon around his boss, putting other soldiers at risk:
http://www.thetelegram.com/Arts---Life/World/2010-05-25/article-1439058/Top-general-in-Afghanistan-found-guilty-in-court-martial-for-inadvertent-shot/1
True, he manned up to the offense.  Nonetheless, it would be interesting to hear more about what he does for Garda.
 
True enough, but he's not the only soldier to have been charged with an ND. He just so happened to be a field commander at the time.
 
frank1515 said:
He got a little too close to a subordinate and got caught,

And tried to obstruct an investigation into the matter.
That is far more serious.

Had he not done that, he would have merely looked like a twit who couldn't control either weapon, rather than a lying, dishonourable twit who couldn't control either weapon.
 
Back
Top