- Reaction score
- 36
- Points
- 560
Jack Layton and his fellow travellers in the Left would have us think that we are all pawns being manipulated by external influences. Here is a refreshing case fo a celebrity who uses his wealth and media power to lay out the opposite case. We need more people like him
http://freewillblog.com/ 21 May 2006
I'm all for working harder, acting better, more education and effective parenting. Do we need a Nanny State to protect us from all evil and tuck us in bed at night? Come to think of it, isn't the Nanny State itself the external influence which manipulates our behavior?
http://freewillblog.com/ 21 May 2006
Don't Be Hatin' The Cos
Bill Cosby has become the subject of national controversy by touring the country, demanding that his fellow African-Americans help bring an end to the culture of victimhood by taking responsibility.
Bill Cosby had just listened as five mothers who lost their teenage sons to gun violence told their tragic stories. He looked out over the audience.
"I hope none of you ever has to get that call," he said. "Those of you with children that age need to look at the walls in their rooms, see what they're writing, see what they're listening to. If you don't want to know that your child has a gun or knows how to get a gun, and if you don't want to believe that this could happen to your child, look up here."
It's stories like these that prompted actor/comedian Cosby two years ago to begin a crusade to spur action toward solving the problems that plague inner-city communities - crime, illiteracy, teen pregnancy. He has held "A Call Out with Bill Cosby" events in about 20 cities so far. They are locally sponsored gatherings aimed at finding solutions for what Cosby sees as self-destructive behavior, and at offering inner-city kids encouragement and better options.
Sounds logical, yet some people are pretty sure that Cosby is all wrong:
In a National Public Radio interview after his book was published last year, Dyson said, "Cosby's overemphasis on personal responsibility, not structural features, wrongly locates the source of poor black suffering - and by implication its remedy - in the lives of the poor...'If only the poor were willing to work harder, act better, get better educated, stay out of jail and parent more effectively, their problems would go away.'"
Apparently, Dyson believes that we need "structural features" in our society to enable people to fix their problems by being lazy, uncultured, uneducated, criminalistic, and neglectful towards their children.
Good grief.
I'm all for working harder, acting better, more education and effective parenting. Do we need a Nanny State to protect us from all evil and tuck us in bed at night? Come to think of it, isn't the Nanny State itself the external influence which manipulates our behavior?


