- Reaction score
- 265
- Points
- 980
Kalatzi said:http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/59927-canadian-soldiers-blowing-up-an-afghan-villagers-house-for-fun
Ummm, without any more background...
That's where I stopped.
Kalatzi said:http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/59927-canadian-soldiers-blowing-up-an-afghan-villagers-house-for-fun
Ummm, without any more background...
CDN Aviator said:Maybe you just need to STFU.
From a questionable blog and a short video, you managed to tell that troops did something wrong and that the chain of command was not doing anything about it. Great job.
Apologies, my father was a corrections officer. He always refered to it as jail guard. No disrespect intended.Jim Seggie said:I'm a soldier AND ajail guardcorrectional officer.
Grimaldus said:Apologies, my father was a corrections officer. He always refered to it as jail guard. No disrespect intended.
Kalatzi said:By that I mean anything questionable.
and this is the one that had teh potential to cause problems.
For those of you who still feel I should STFU.
Scott said:Anyone sharing any digital media in this day of age should be slapped with the hand of stupid.
dapaterson said:But there's the challenge. How can the CF effectively communicate with the public what it's accomplishing without using digital media?
The best recruiting tools aren't sappy movies made by DND, but rather people reaching out and talking with their families and friends.
Ther's a need for balance, common sense and security, but any blanket prohibition would be counter-productive.
Kalatzi said:If they weren't able to get their hands on it no problem.
I'm just pleased that this has managed to remain a very small molehill.
"Never pass a fault"
Kalatzi said:To those who suggest I should STFU.
In some cases yes. This one? NO.
I didn't realize how bad the original site was.
Thought that by giving the benefit of teh doubt that that a better explanation would emerge.
Taken aback that Dogger1936 seeems to be censured for this.
I think that there may be a lot of people that have similar footage for personal use.
Common sense, as well I imagine as well as formal direction dictates that it not get onto the net. By that I mean anything questionable.
I did some checking on youtube after the fact there must be a coule of hundred videos, and this is the one that had teh potential to cause problems.
Soooo, what percentage of slip-ups do we allow???? How about none.
For those of you who still feel I should STFU.
Thank you for your opinions. I am honoured by them.