• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Bringing 'Em Back or Not? (I.D.'ed Cdn ISIS fighters, families, kids?)

What is it with people from Squamish?

They're a very passionate people... might have something to do with being able to own your own home so close to alot of great drugs ;)


“My radicalization was really about impressing my boyfriend, Gerry. What turned Gerry on was me being a militant urban guerrilla. … He wasn’t my boyfriend, he had no feelings for me.”

 
Just moved these last two posts here where they & other returnees have been discussed.

Milnet.ca Staff

This from the RCMP info-machine ...
... and a bit of back story (Nov 2023) ...
... and what Wikipedia has to say about that ISIS female unit
Usual reminder: According to Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, "Any person charged with an offence has the right .... to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal."
I think I'd like to know more about this Sean Moore fellow.
 
I think I'd like to know more about this Sean Moore fellow.
Quite the ... adventurer, him - an initial Google-fu shows he seems to have done work trying to help Yazidis et. al. in/around Kurdistan. Some back story going back to 2015 ...
"Canadian man held captive in Syria says he was tortured, kept in cell that felt 'like a coffin' " (cbc.ca)
 
The latest on one of those wanting to come back to Canada ...
A bit of back story: kids brought back earlier this year ...
... without the mom. Federal Court was asked to allow the mom back in late last year ...
... but I can't find the case on the FC site.
 
A bit of the latest via CTV ...

Canadian ISIS sniper: I didn't behead anyone or anything like that! (archived here)
Then there's (still) this guy (archived here and here) - says he's OK coming back to Canada & prefers to serve a sentence in Canadian jail (although media statements aren't taken under oath, right?).
More backstory on Letts (dual Brit-Canadian who's had his Brit citizenship stripped - in March of this year, The Supremes decided not to hear a case brought by his family's lawyer to bring him & some others back to Canada)
 
Then there's (still) this guy (archived here and here) - says he's OK coming back to Canada & prefers to serve a sentence in Canadian jail (although media statements aren't taken under oath, right?).
More backstory on Letts (dual Brit-Canadian who's had his Brit citizenship stripped - in March of this year, The Supremes decided not to hear a case brought by his family's lawyer to bring him & some others back to Canada)

Following the SCC denial of leave to appeal in Letts’ case in March, his lawyers filed a last ditch motion for the court to reconsider the denial of leave to appeal. That was denied on November 1st. Letts’ case to be repatriated has run its full course through Canadian courts and he has lost fully and finally. If he ever comes to Canada (I won’t say ‘return’, cause although a dual citizen I don’t believe he’s ever been here), it won’t be because the courts forced the government to facilitate it.

The other male Canadian ISIS suspects detained in Syrian were part of the same chain of cases and were denied leave to appeal to SCC in, I think, the same decision. Letts is the only case I know of who asked the SCC to reconsider, and it was denied. Safe bet none of the rest would prevail with the same request.

Any Canadian citizen has the right to enter Canada should they make it here, but the courts have made it clear the government has no obligation to help repatriate them.
 
Last edited:
The other male Canadian ISIS suspects detained in Syrian were part of the same chain of cases and were denied leave to appeal to SCC in, I think, the same decision. Letts is the only case I know of who asked the SCC to reconsider, and it was denied. Safe bet none of the rest would prevail with the same request.

Any Canadian citizen has the right to enter Canada should they make it here, but the courts have made it clear the government has no obligation to help repatriate them.
IF they manage to make it back, could they be arrested and held for trial?
 
I’m guessing the reason the Kurds aren’t putting them on planes and deporting them to St. John’s is they don’t have the money for that.
 
Well, this is good news...

The sentencing on this will be fascinating to read.

I expect some people will be pretty unhappy with time served, it she spent years in a really awful Kurdish prison camp without any due process whatsoever, and it took the government of Canada quite a while to agree to repatriate her. That will probably factor. She went over there very young, and essentially was a ‘bride of ISIS’ but didn’t directly participate in anything. I’m curious, had she. It pled guilty and it went to trial, and heather in fact crown would have succeeded in proving the terrorism offence.

I don’t believe there’s any direct precedent for a case like this, so it’ll be interesting to see how the judge reasons out the sentence.
 
The sentencing on this will be fascinating to read.

I expect some people will be pretty unhappy with time served, it she spent years in a really awful Kurdish prison camp without any due process whatsoever, and it took the government of Canada quite a while to agree to repatriate her. That will probably factor. She went over there very young, and essentially was a ‘bride of ISIS’ but didn’t directly participate in anything. I’m curious, had she. It pled guilty and it went to trial, and heather in fact crown would have succeeded in proving the terrorism offence.

I don’t believe there’s any direct precedent for a case like this, so it’ll be interesting to see how the judge reasons out the sentence.
Can't find anything from the judge yet, but this tidbit is in the Public Prosecution Service statement (also attached if link doesn't work):
"... In an Agreed Statement of Facts filed with the court, Ms. Chouay admitted to travelling to Syria to join the ranks of ISIS, knowing that her expected role would include marrying an ISIS fighter and raising children under the ISIS doctrine. Ms. Chouay is not suspected of having participated directly in terrorist activities, namely actual combat.

In addition to her pre-trial custody, Ms. Chouay has been subject to strict bail conditions since January 2023 and has participated in depolarization therapy. Independent psychiatric and psychological experts in the field of terrorism evaluated Ms. Chouay's progress over the past 30 and a half months and concluded that the risk of recidivism and dangerousness is very low. The Integrated National Security Enforcement Team led by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police share the assessment that she does not present a significant risk to Canadian society.

Director of Public Prosecution, George Dolhai, stated: "The recommended sentence here takes into consideration the early, ongoing, demonstrated and independently evaluated steps Ms. Chouay has taken to demonstrate remorse, take responsibility, commit to fundamental change and a rejection of extremist ideology. This addresses the ultimate goal of protecting the community" ..."
 

Attachments

Can't find anything from the judge yet, but this tidbit is in the Public Prosecution Service statement (also attached if link doesn't work):
"... In an Agreed Statement of Facts filed with the court, Ms. Chouay admitted to travelling to Syria to join the ranks of ISIS, knowing that her expected role would include marrying an ISIS fighter and raising children under the ISIS doctrine. Ms. Chouay is not suspected of having participated directly in terrorist activities, namely actual combat.

In addition to her pre-trial custody, Ms. Chouay has been subject to strict bail conditions since January 2023 and has participated in depolarization therapy. Independent psychiatric and psychological experts in the field of terrorism evaluated Ms. Chouay's progress over the past 30 and a half months and concluded that the risk of recidivism and dangerousness is very low. The Integrated National Security Enforcement Team led by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police share the assessment that she does not present a significant risk to Canadian society.

Director of Public Prosecution, George Dolhai, stated: "The recommended sentence here takes into consideration the early, ongoing, demonstrated and independently evaluated steps Ms. Chouay has taken to demonstrate remorse, take responsibility, commit to fundamental change and a rejection of extremist ideology. This addresses the ultimate goal of protecting the community" ..."
Too bad that the original homeowners in Mosul, Tel Afar and where ever else she lived in the 'donated' houses she was given, can't be found and sue her for 'rent/lease' payments while she lived in their homes. Sue her for destruction of property or whatever.
 
Too bad that the original homeowners in Mosul, Tel Afar and where ever else she lived in the 'donated' houses she was given, can't be found and sue her for 'rent/lease' payments while she lived in their homes. Sue her for destruction of property or whatever.
It!’s funny you say that. In the international war crimes investigation/prosecution community, there’s been appetite to investigate and prosecute the war crime of ‘pillaging’ to cover exactly this sort of expropriation of homes and goods by ISIS, and giving same to people who went over to join. The Germans have had at least two succesful pillaging prosecutions.

It would be damned hard to make such a prosecution in Canada under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, but the law does exist to do it if the admissible (and fairly specific) evidence can be obtained.

Canada’s judicial system makes war crimes prosecutions very hard, often due to the quality and provenance of the evidence…
 
It!’s funny you say that. In the international war crimes investigation/prosecution community, there’s been appetite to investigate and prosecute the war crime of ‘pillaging’ to cover exactly this sort of expropriation of homes and goods by ISIS, and giving same to people who went over to join. The Germans have had at least two succesful pillaging prosecutions.

It would be damned hard to make such a prosecution in Canada under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, but the law does exist to do it if the admissible (and fairly specific) evidence can be obtained.

Canada’s judicial system makes war crimes prosecutions very hard, often due to the quality and provenance of the evidence…
There is a case ongoing now in Montreal of a former Iraqi Jewish family who's ancestorial home in Baghdad has been the residence of the French Ambassador for a few decades now. At first France paid them a 'lease' payment for their house (which the Iraqi government seized in the past) but over the years France has not been making the payments. Its now in front of the courts.

 
There is a case ongoing now in Montreal of a former Iraqi Jewish family who's ancestorial home in Baghdad has been the residence of the French Ambassador for a few decades now. At first France paid them a 'lease' payment for their house (which the Iraqi government seized in the past) but over the years France has not been making the payments. Its now in front of the courts.

That’s an interesting one, thanks for that.

A challenging reality of going civil against former ISIS members is they’re unlikely to have any assets from which damages can be recovered.

Civil’s not really my jam though, I’m far more comfortable weighing in on the criminal law side.
 
That’s an interesting one, thanks for that.

A challenging reality of going civil against former ISIS members is they’re unlikely to have any assets from which damages can be recovered.

Civil’s not really my jam though, I’m far more comfortable weighing in on the criminal law side.
All for 'garnishing' any future wages that they may have or come into, in the future until the debt has been paid off.
 
Can't find anything from the judge yet, but this tidbit is in the Public Prosecution Service statement (also attached if link doesn't work):
"... In an Agreed Statement of Facts filed with the court, Ms. Chouay admitted to travelling to Syria to join the ranks of ISIS, knowing that her expected role would include marrying an ISIS fighter and raising children under the ISIS doctrine. Ms. Chouay is not suspected of having participated directly in terrorist activities, namely actual combat.

In addition to her pre-trial custody, Ms. Chouay has been subject to strict bail conditions since January 2023 and has participated in depolarization therapy. Independent psychiatric and psychological experts in the field of terrorism evaluated Ms. Chouay's progress over the past 30 and a half months and concluded that the risk of recidivism and dangerousness is very low. The Integrated National Security Enforcement Team led by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police share the assessment that she does not present a significant risk to Canadian society.

Director of Public Prosecution, George Dolhai, stated: "The recommended sentence here takes into consideration the early, ongoing, demonstrated and independently evaluated steps Ms. Chouay has taken to demonstrate remorse, take responsibility, commit to fundamental change and a rejection of extremist ideology. This addresses the ultimate goal of protecting the community" ..."
In 1976 the government of PET decided "rehabilitation" should be the focus of prisons and less on punishment.

Lets see how that works out, because so far it seems to have failed.
 
Back
Top