211RadOp
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 15
- Points
- 230
I thought they were: Too big, too small and not in stock. Now I'm confused ???Oldgateboatdriver said:We used to joke that there were three sizes in the CF: Too big, Too small and Mistake (it fits)![]()

I thought they were: Too big, too small and not in stock. Now I'm confused ???Oldgateboatdriver said:We used to joke that there were three sizes in the CF: Too big, Too small and Mistake (it fits)![]()
Strike said:You guys are complaining about the shirts? What about the DEU pants that the women are stuck with? It doesn't matter what size you get, the hip size is 10 inches bigger than the waist size, which needs to be worn up to the bottom of one's bra. If not then you risk looking like you're wearing Jeanie/MC Hammer pants. Many of us have to get our docs changed every year so we can order male pants.
Strike said:You guys are complaining about the shirts? What about the DEU pants that the women are stuck with? It doesn't matter what size you get, the hip size is 10 inches bigger than the waist size, which needs to be worn up to the bottom of one's bra. If not then you risk looking like you're wearing Jeanie/MC Hammer pants. Many of us have to get our docs changed every year so we can order male pants.
Inky said:Last year, I bought myself shirt stays and I never looked back. It does the job decently and eliminated the muffin top look.
Only problem is that It makes anyone look like they're wearing a Moulin Rouge get-up whenever the trousers come off.
MCG said:In the civi world, you would never buy a suit based solely on the three measurements of waist, chest and height to shoulders (and even there the jacket does not make use of the waist measurement).
MCG said:In the civi world, you would never buy a suit based solely on the three measurements of waist, chest and height to shoulders (and even there the jacket does not make use of the waist measurement). I wonder if we could reduce CAF tailoring costs by having LogisticUnicorps ship uniforms sized to include more measurements.
MCG said:CF pants are waiste and height to shoulders. CAF jackets are chest and height to shoulders. Those are not adequate for a proper fit. Height to shoulders is only relevant for gaberdines, ball gowns and prison jump suits. Get measured for a suit and you are looking at waiste and at least one of inseam or height to waist, then for the jacket it is at least chest, waist to shoulders and sleeve length.
Seanjj said:Excuse my ignorance as I'm a civvie but do you have the option of having your uniforms tailored/tightened of they fit poorly?
trustnoone73 said:I believe there are four measurements for all CF shirts/tunics. Waist, chest, height to shoulders, and sum of all three added to the belly. For pants there is only one measurement. Inseam/waist. They shall be the same.
MCG said:I've haven't seen resumes, passports or birth-certificates to compare anecdotes, but I've been to master tailors and I've been to Moore's - all take more than three measurements even to just pick from what is pre made. I have a friend who has researched this and concluded five measurements would be the minimum to ensure fit of both pants and jacket ... A quick google search seems to corroborate this with the hits demanding either 5 to 6 measurements or 15 to 20+ measurements. From my own very limited exposure to anthropometric design (engineering things so they will fit and be usable by people), I know that waist is not an invariable predictor of chest, and that neither height, inseam, nor sleeve length invariably predicts one of the others.
I'm not suggesting your old Italian is the only guy who knows his trade. Maybe you exist on the centre of every bell-curve of human proportions - you fit all the assumptions a tailor would make given less information. If your guy is as good as you believe, he could probably see this (much as you can look at a crest line and see the number of fighting vehicles to fit into it). He only took three measurements because that is enough for you.

E.R. Campbell said:Yes!!!
![]()
upandatom said:Those four measurements are ridiculous, I am forced to wear a size 38 jean/pant so my quads can fit into pants properly. Even then that is pushing it. My waist is a 34-36.
medicineman said:Not trying to sound like an *** here - I have to ask what cut of cut jeans are you wearing then?
MM
exgunnertdo said:Hey, Strike - have you been on Logistik lately? There are women's flat front pants now. They're not amazing, but they are a million times better than the pleated things. They don't sit nearly as high on the waist as the pleated ones. Pleated are also available for those that like them![]()
Transporter said:The long sleeve dress shirt is a disaster. If you don't want to be choked to death by the collar, you have to go with a size that makes it look like you're wearing a f****** moomoo. The shirt pockets are almost in your armpits and that's just for a 17" neck size, which for me allows for a bit of shrinkage to the 16.5" I normally wear. And don't get me started on the high-waisted, wide-legged DEU pants or the maternity wear looking gabardine.