daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
 - 41,765
 
- Points
 - 1,160
 

I’ve never understood people who take a deserved apology as a sign of weakness.
It sounded like a few people were sobbing in the audience. The apology clearly impacted some that obviously needed to hear it.
Releasing racists, and other toxic people from the military is still very difficult. It takes years, and a lot of people are harmed along the way.
The apology should come with an action (not just an action plan) to more aggressively go after the these toxic people.
					
				
						
					
					suzannedowning.com
				That sours the apology.She wept as she declared that “racism has no place” in the military and promised a long list of reforms -anti-racism training, systemic bias reviews, and the dismantling of “institutional barriers.”
Yeah, it was noticed by more than a few ...
Oh, Canada! Defense chief crying on stage is pitiful virtue signaling – sending the wrong signal
Canada’s top defense officer cried on stage this week.
On Thursday, General Jennie Carignan, Canada’s first female Chief of the Defence Staff, the highest rank in the Canadian Armed Forces, stood in Ottawa and issued a tearful apology for what she called “systemic racism” inside the Canadian Armed Forces.
She wept as she declared that “racism has no place” in the military and promised a long list of reforms -anti-racism training, systemic bias reviews, and the dismantling of “institutional barriers.”
Let’s be clear: No one is defending racism. But what happened on that stage wasn’t strength, but rather weakness masquerading as virtue.
This wasn’t a commander leading her troops into battle. It was a bureaucrat reading a script designed by political consultants. The apology wasn’t even required by law. It was just part of the new virtue signaling political ritual in which the armed forces bow before progressive ideology instead of projecting power.
Carignan’s tears were broadcast across Canada, praised by the CBC, The Globe and Mail, and every other outlet that mistakes emotional display for moral courage.
If Canada wants to be taken seriously on the world stage again, it needs fewer tears and more backbone.
Because when your general cries on stage, your country looks weak. And weakness, in a dangerous world, is an invitation.
![]()
Oh, Canada! Defense chief crying on stage is pitiful virtue signaling - sending the wrong signal - Suzanne Downing
Suzanne Downing is a respected journalist, editor, and commentator who has shaped Alaska’s media and political conversation for years. She previously served as editor of the Juneau Empire and as a speechwriter for Governor Sean Parnell, where her ability to communicate with clarity and purpose...suzannedowning.com
No and no.Sorry are we supposed to know who this rando is and care what she thinks?
While on PAT platoon doing boring base upkeep work, I can distinctly remember a very black member of the Navy- a reserve PO Bosun (a Quebecker known to us as O2O for “one tough ‘ombré”) - having his skin colour ridiculed. By an army officer from Work Point. It took an incredibly filthy mouthed CWO to diffuse that and I thought for sure there was going to be a homicide. But then he asked me what reserve I was from, and that completely surprised me so I replied AOK (Aundeck Omni Kaning) thinking he meant Indian Reserve. Turns out he meant Navy reserve, and when the CWO with his shiny black boots and ridiculous looking army garrison dress turned on me and got in my face I thought I would be the one committing homicide as I was installing a fire extinguisher. I mean hell, I like to think the military is now different. None of that was anything to cry about 40 years later. We were all men, young tough men in the 80’s yes, but military service types nonetheless. Low expectations on treatment were set and met, and that you can work with.For sure there was systemic racism in CAF. It was reflective of society, sure, but it was there and it was poisonous. CAF as an institution has always had a need to do right by its people, and for a long time a lot of people weren’t done right by because they didn’t look like me, or like a lot of us here. Historically, plenty of CAF members were mistreated due to race.
In the vein of “you did the best you knew how to do, and when you knew better, you did better”- it’s right to take ownership of an historical wrong, acknowledge it, and pledge to be better. The CDS’ apology on behalf of the institution is an appropriate and necessary step in this ownership. Similar to comparable historical mistreatment of women, or of LGBT members. I’m out now, but to best of my recollection all CAF members were supposed to be treated equally as basic human, and assessed for the quality of their work for CAF.
I’ve never understood people who take a deserved apology as a sign of weakness.