Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 15,789
- Points
- 1,260
I like the shape of the bow on 105.
That is the vibe I got from their Polar Class announcement, that the partnership brings more than just icebreaking capability.For those who can't see the video;
Very interesting showing from Davie, I have never seen these renders or related info elsewhere yet. We'll see if its all blunder, Davie doesn't have much of a track record to go off especially with warships. I wonder if these are just repackaged designs they got from buying Helsinki Shipyards lol.
Kongsberg supplying props to the RCDs (first deliveries in 2028):
![]()
Kongsberg to supply propulsion systems for Canada's River-class destroyers
Kongsberg Maritime has been awarded a contract to supply fixed built propellers (FBP) for the River-class destroyer (RCD) program.www.navaltoday.com
Then the company supplying the shafts can say "We shafted them, good!"There has to be a joke in there somewhere.
“We had to supply the props first, that way the engineers can receive a proper shaft.”![]()
Yah currently 24. I don't know what they've done with the ExLS space. I think its become CSE storage space for tools and equipment. Or they may have just removed it entirely.This video covers some of the reasons we choose the Type 26 over the others. But I believe he got the VLS number wrong for the Canadian version, which I think is currently 24?
the 24 seaceptors in front of the Mk41 on the UK version orYah currently 24. I don't know what they've done with the ExLS space. I think its become CSE storage space for tools and equipment. Or they may have just removed it entirely.
The ones back aft. The canadian version never had the sea ceptors up forward.the 24 seaceptors in front of the Mk41 on the UK version or
the 24 seaceptors amidships?
both areas are available to be repurposed on our variant correct?
is searam going to be placed where CIWS was?
View attachment 95826
View attachment 95829
View attachment 95828
no but presumably we are making use of that space as well for something? Do we plan on putting the 8 MK41 back in there at some point?The ones back aft. The canadian version never had the sea ceptors up forward.
lol.no but presumably we are making use of that space as well for something? Do we plan on putting the 8 MK41 back in there at some point?
is searam going to be placed where CIWS was?
Sea ceptor launchers are very short and because of their cold launch capability are very compact. Mk 41 launchers (that currently exist) are much too long to fit into the same space as where the ExLS was going to be without losing a good chunk of the mission bay.no but presumably we are making use of that space as well for something? Do we plan on putting the 8 MK41 back in there at some point?
Makes sense from a coverage perspective, but that's also a weird spot because its on top of an exhaust stack. So good luck doing any maintenance, reloads or inspections while underway if those generators its exhaust are working. Also it looks dumb there (not a valid concern), and really damages the ships radar cross section.The RAM launcher seems to have been added to this digital model on the cover of the latest issue of the Maritime Engineering Journal.
(I ignore the articles and only read it for the pictures)