• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

I don't disagree, but I thought one of the design principles for the first batch of 3 was to use mature and in-service systems to reduce risk as much as possible?
NULKA is becoming an older system that while still capable, is being left behind by the incoming LEED system on US warships. They do want to utilize mature and in-service systems to reduce risk however, items as important as decoys and the electronic warfare suite cannot afford to be second class or otherwise outdated given the increasingly dangerous threat environments the RCN is facing. The fact that they are putting them aboard in such seemingly large numbers signifies to me how important this system is.

By the time that the first RCD comes into service in the early 2030's, LEED should already be proven and in service for a significant period of time.
 
Like as not the first Type 26s in the water will be sailed by Norwegian sailors.


"Disclosed on 27 March, the changes to the 2025-2036 defence plan – which was approved in 2024 – also see spending increased by NKr115 billion ($11.8 billion) over the period.

"Among several areas, that increase will be used to “accelerate the phasing in of new submarines and [the] procurement of the first two frigates”, the document states. “The frigates will be equipped with maritime helicopters with anti-submarine warfare capability as an integral part of the combat system.”

"Norway in August 2025 selected the BAE Systems-led bid, signalling its intention to acquire at least five Type 26 frigates, with the first delivery expected in 2030."

The RN expects its first to be commissioned in 2028. But Norway has the money. The RN needs the money.
 
And Norway is covering the RN's patch in the GIUK gap courtesy of the Lunna House agreement.

So even if the hulls don't go into RN service they will be doing their intended jobs.
 
Back
Top