• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canadians slandered in The Economist magazine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Danno
  • Start date Start date
Canada is the best country to live in, and trust me, I know. So what if we don‘t have such a big army as the US or Britian, that just means there are less people that hate us for invading their country.

It is the US‘ duty to protect the world from "the axis of evil" - Bush, what an moron, and other major terrorist forces, they have the money, man power and resources, so they are faced with that responsibility, no question about it. But when they go into places like Afganistan and Iraq on there own, and after demand other countries to help them out, well sorry, you got into the mess, you get yourself out. When your own soldiers die every day in attacks, don‘t expect other countries to help out anytime soon.

Yes, i agree, Canada does need an Army, there is no question about it. But it does not need to grow to a point where it starts to piss people (countries) off.

Americans - before you start to banter other countries, look at your own. You are the one who have over 90% of the world hate you. You are the ones who have airplanes flown into buildings and embassy‘s blown, so don‘t think we are ones who need protection from rediciously large armies.

:salute: :cdn: :salute:
 
why was the US brought into the post? I am so confused
Take a look at the first post.

I think we can all agree that chretin is no rocket scientist either
Well, i‘ve never heard him use words like "evil doers". It is a shame that such an intelligent nation has such a stupid president.

LOL..... nice one...
It is all true buddy.
 
Yes, i do understand what he says, i believe its called a French Acsent.

Anyone else want to contribute to some American-Canadian country bashing? Don‘t worry it‘s all in good fun. :p
 
jutes,

Yes, i agree, Canada does need an Army, there is no question about it. But it does not need to grow to a point where it starts to piss people (countries) off.
That‘s that whole "if we didn‘t have any soldiers there wouldn‘t be any wars" mentality. IMHO that‘s flawed and naiive thinking. Would having 6 Infantry Regiments force us to change foreign policy and take a more proactive role in global affairs or would it mean better insurance for all future situations both domestic and foreign not to mention less strain on the men and women who are tasked with countless tours? Having a strong military is not indicative of foreign animosity. That‘s the job of piss poor statesmen.
 
nULL
Freedom isn‘t free...
too bad they didn‘t teach you that in university...
 
Originally posted by Slim:
[qb] nULL
Freedom isn‘t free...
too bad they didn‘t teach you that in university... [/qb]
It‘d be really nice if someone could settle that word for me. Too many stupid people throwing that word around as justification to do stupid things.

What I learned in high school was that "freedom" was a shi*ty justification for anything and could be used by just about anyone, from the "good guys" like you, to the "good guys" who crash planes into buildings. It‘s all relative, which is why "freedom" is such a ridiculous notion.
 
It‘d be really nice if someone could settle that word for me. Too many stupid people throwing that word around as justification to do stupid things.

What I learned in high school was that "freedom" was a shi*ty justification for anything and could be used by just about anyone, from the "good guys" like you, to the "good guys" who crash planes into buildings. It‘s all relative, which is why "freedom" is such a ridiculous notion.
Its really good to see you learned what freedom is in highschool nIMWIT. Its good to see you‘ve reached that Enlightened state that we were ignorant of until now.

Your relativist arguement is nice and academic, but in the real world, it means jacksh*t. In the real world freedom becomes absolute reality to the "good guys" those who have to look it in the eye everyday. Be thankful that "good guys" like Slim don‘t pay attention to dribble like yours when they are standing on the line, lest you become the next one watching your family members get raped infront of you before you are burned alive. A little too viceral for you? Check Slim‘s credentials out, he can probably tell you first hand about sh*t like that. Some times you got to pick sides...if your equating what you‘ve been given to the freedom to live in caves and stone adulterous women to death, you got reception problems.

If you think the "freedom" that "good guys" like us give your spoiled university-sodden a*s is such a ridiculous notion, go live in Angola. Until then, on behalf of myself, Slim and the rest of the community, thanks for the lecture.
 
Well I‘ll be honest, I‘ve been staring at this forum for a half hour, and I would say that infanteer has parried with the critical strike. Although I‘m sure someone will try to say something inflammatory, as is often the case.
All that aside, I must say Bravo to infanteer for one of the finest postings I have seen on the site, I‘m completely out of words to describe that.

But while I‘m on my soapbox here, there was a little Arab bashing by the Major up there.
So I think i‘ll turn the topic for the moment. (feel free to return to the original at anypoint....whatever it was.)

Have the Arabs become the new society for everyone to ride (In the same spirit westerners called the vietnamese gooks during the crusade against communism)?

Also will it become common place on this forum (And any other forum on the site) to insult,however subtle it may seem, a society that most people know next to nothing about? Other then, of course, the images that the media crams down our throats (towelheaded fanatics waving their ak‘s and shouting koranic verses)

Having grown up in the middle east and Canada (Father white, mother arab) I can tell you that the arabic language is so complex and beautifuL(poofter word I know) that there wouldn‘t even be a translation for a word as simple and childish as "Evil-doer" Perhaps it doesn‘t translate easily into Arabic so much as it translates into Arkansas-ian (pardon the guess at what the proper term is), or "we‘ll be right back after the next commercial, you‘re watching CNN headline news"-ian.

Also I can say for certain, that the majority of people living in the middle east, do not support stoning, and live in houses that are not carved out of rock. The middle east society is as complex and believe it or not in most cases..... "free" (OH I SAID THAT BAD WORD DIDNT I?) as ours, but of course, very, very very different. BUT that is another book altogether, and anyone who wants to talk about it is more then welcome to start a posting. I would like to but I‘ve already written so much here.

However, i also think it is entirely unfair to label president Bush as a moron, he did managed to win an election without getting the majority of votes as well as convince a large portion of an entire country of 300 million (give or take) that Saddam Hussein personally parachuted out of the 747 before it hit the WTC.(That was a joke but I‘m sure we all get it)

So, stupid? No, Moron? No. Crafty, heartless, dirty, money grubbing, power thirsty? Perhaps. But how can we not stop stop to laugh, in a friendly manner, at his innocent, child-like attempts at eating pretzels...or playing with shiny objects.

Anyway back to my original point, seriously infanteer that was one of the finest and to the point postings yet and certainly goes to show anyone who thought something to the contrary, that the most important things you learn in life are not learned in highschool (I know it shocked me too), hope to see more.
 
ouch!

i think my point got a tad misinterpreted in there. apologies to all that were offended, or took it the wrong way.

i suppose what i meant to say was that when using the word "freedom" alone to justify doing something doesn‘t have much historical credibility. something like what infanteer said ("family members raped in front of you then burned to death") is much better. yeah, a tad visceral, but if everyone knew such things happened, then they‘d be a cry to stop it, and then it would be harder for world leaders to pursure their own agendas, right?
 
There‘s so much wrong with that statement, I don‘t know where to begin.

"DO you have any idea why president Bush uses the Term "Evil Doers?" Hmmm, lets see ....might be because it translates well into Arabic....who is stupid? Just a thought "

Alright, please sir if you‘re not calling Arabs stupid, please tell me who? I mean, most Arabs...do..speak..Arabic, and if it is Arabic that Evildoers translates so perfectly into, then we must be talking about Arabs.And if calling someone stupid, isn‘t considered bashing them, then what is?

And I‘ll deal with this first. 90% of Arabs are Muslim. I was raised half muslim and half christian (Which is impossible...yeah pretty much but it still happened), so if we are going to open up this can, by all means. So if we are just talking about muslims here, then 9 times out of 10 you‘re going to get an arab that is a muslim, and that is why it becomes offensive if you say you‘re just talking about muslims because 90% of Arabs are muslim. So take out 10% of them, and you‘ve still go 90% who are offended.


"I would say I am not really keen on the muslim population that believes their ills cam be blamed entirely on the west, christian crusaders, or the zionists."

Ahhh the West (modern). They‘ve exploited the oil, and fought more proxy wars there then I can name. Backing Osama Bin Laden to fight the soviets, and in the process turn an entire country into a mine field. Although in the west‘s defence, we are trying to fix it now. Supported both Iraq and Iran in their war against each other, which is purported to be the bloodiest and most brutal war in this era (They‘re still negotiating over POW‘s and it ended before the first persian gulf).

Christian crusaders, is a problem native to the middle east, so once again back to the Arab question. It wasn‘t so much a problem with the number of lives lost in the crusades (It is very hard to find a definite number) It was a loss of the culture and everything attatched to it. The Arabs/Muslims had been very busy while the west was going through the "Dark ages‘ They had been translating every important work ever printed by anyone, into Arabic learning from it and cataloguing it in one of their HUGE librarys. ENTER the Crusaders, who not only Killed all the Arabs/Muslims/Jews/believe it or not christiansm, that they came across but Burned down the entire town, librarys and all. The works were lost, the history of the people was lost and the dignity of an entire religion an culutre was defaced by the crusaders. So yes it still is a touchy spot.

The Zionists...well...quite frankly this is a subject i do not normally touch with a 10 foot pole, but for you Maj. Anything. The zionist (it is important to distinguish between zionists and Jews RIGHT now) movement, began a war in what is today israel that displaced an entire population of people, turning them into permanent refugees. And is still in contradiction of a UN resolution (ah who cares). So it is not fair to say that all Muslims dislike the zionists (nothing is absolute), but the Palestinian people do not have a voice, someone must speak for them and who better then their muslim brothers (what else is religion good for really). As for television, which comes up later, if you watch a program on i think BET (a station we have in common with you guys down south) it is about donating money to send Jews home to Israel. One of the selling points is that "On average Palestinian familys have 5-7 children, so we need to send as many Jews home to Israel as we can to fight the future battles."

So in summary, it can at least be seen why the Muslim/Arab population of the Middle east CAN blame alot of their "ills" in the West‘s Exploitation, Christian Crusades and Zionism (which as we discussed is native to Palestine, but their fellow muslims have taken up the plight of the crippled people, much in the same spirit you find a Christian helping a fellow christian) And perhaps it isn‘t fair that Muslims blame their Ill‘s on the west, but is it fair that Americans blame THEIR ills on Muslims?

"the 12th century, that is something that they did on their own"

Just for clarification, who are "THey" and what are "They" doing in the 12th century? Last time I checked, Muslims (Arabs, Christians, Jews included) were being cut down and having their culture raped by what could be considered the west. SO I‘m not to sure how the Muslims cut themselves in Half vertically (as was the practice of the Christians). It presents a problem to say the least.

In the future could you please name the television show you were watching, it helps a great deal so I can get a better idea of where you are coming from sir(I do like to have a civil and fair debate). Also I think you will find that Muslims were far more Humane to civilians then the Christian crusaders had ever been and were less likely to be found burning down the librarys and hospitals. While it is never good when another country invades another, so perhaps it would have been fair if the television had shown another side(I mean..I didn‘t make it in the first place but...) but as far as occupation and "encroachments" go, the muslim conquest of Spain had been far more humane then the Christian crusades....or even the Spanish conquest of the new world.

"oh, by the way...not all arabs are muslim and not all muslims are arab, but of course you knew that."

I did know that thankyou sir, but as I said before, 90% of arabs are muslim so when you insult the Muslim population, you also insult 90% of the Arab population.

Well this HAS turned into an excellent forum!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Oops I forgot to address one of the points.

"Maybe you can tell me why so many muslims apply for the US green card lottery every year? Seems to me that all I hear is how bad the west is but they are standing in line to get to the west....maybe you can comment?"

And how many Muslims/ARabs stay, of their own free will? I Wager it will be a far greater population than that that is leaving.

I have no figures in front of me, so perhaps we can postpone that point for a bit sir. We will come back to it of course, but for the moment we‘ll put it on the backburner until we can get some numbers.
 
Also Sir, I hope we can seperate debate and personal feelings, I‘d say that is the norm for this forum. But perhaps if you will excuse me for getting heated at times because this argument does strike a chord rather close to my home.
So I apologise in advance if anything offends ANYone please, do not take it personally.
 
I‘m still not sure if I follow, perhaps it is just the way it was written out.
As long as that part of the posting is cleared up all is well.

Attitude based on getting shot at? Explain.

Either way you seem to have failed to address anything I wrote in response to your posting. Except for pointing out that you are not a hate mongerer.
 
I am not a hate monger and I take offence when someone suggests I am bashing anyone, unless it is the French.
Sorry, I had to laugh at that one. Bit of a contradiciton there eh? :D

How do you feel Che? Need to go out and hit the bag for awhile? You articulated your points well; taught me a few things which I‘ll look into a bit closer at some point.

And no thanks, Freedom Fries contain transfat‘s, I think I‘ll just stick with Hommus & Pita.
 
Sorry, kidding. I grew up on the west coast in a Scottish household; in a town which considers itself more English than England. It‘s almost genetic to poke fun at those from Quebec in my family, but I‘m striving to rise above that - I just stumble a lot.

Besides, I love French woman. It‘s those loud little guys who hang around with them.

Oops, I tripped again :D
 
ah no hard feelings at all, this is all friendly discussion between soldiers.

If you would like to know more just ask, i‘ve got a wall full of books and head full of arguments about everything to a certain extent...except the french actually.

Yes, yes I know The "University sodden brat". But I worked through university and now I have loans to pay off and I serve the country for a living. haha you should see the looks the men give me, if I could read their minds I know what they‘d say

"He‘s one of those god **** officers who reads more then he fights."

But then again, so was Patton and of course "CHE"

If anyone has seen the movie "We were soldiers" kind of like the first impression of Mel Gibson, Minus the "Blow em all to **** " attitude.
 
Back
Top