- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
I have been doing a lot of research and PT for application to the CF (DEO MARS/Artillery/Logistics). I have also been trying to get in touch with a WO in CFRC Montreal (based on a recommendation from an officer in CFRC) to find out about a specific knee/ankle problem I have. While I am not looking for a definitive 'yeah/nay' on my condition, I am looking for an indication as to whether it is realistic to even apply. Unfortunately this WO has not been returning my calls (left 4 or 5 voicemails but fully understand it is not really his job to answer calls from off-the-street) so I have come here for some insight.
My question relates to the occupation factor in the CEMS (common enrolment medical standard). I understand that the point of the CEMS is to make sure that the candidate is employable in as many possible MOCs and to make sure the candidate has maximum chance for success. It seems to me that any orthopaedic injuries would generally be assessed under the O factor. For existing CF members, the task statements for each MOCs provide guidelines on the occupational demands that may be impacted by any injury or condition and help to therefore guide an evaluation to potential limitations for that member, in his/her MOC. However, how is this assessed in the CEMS? For example, in my case, should I assume that the nature of my injury must not limit me from the most punishing of tasks among all MOCs (probably NCM Infantry)? If I were to be naive, I might say "well as long as I pass the Generic Task statement, I should be OK" but I presume I would be wrong there.
Why I am trying to get insight into this is that although my injury is permanent (15 years old now and includes permanent nerve damage) and has a significant impact (I cannot balance on my right foot and generally wear an ankle brace), I have had no reinjury issues (even after 3 years of rugby) and it has not reduced my running/hiking abilities. It would likely be an issue in say carrying a 35kg pack through the Afghan mountains or in parachuting (it’s not the fall, it’s the sudden stop at the end that gets you). In just about anything else, I’m confident in being able to do anything requested of me, without limitation. So in assessing the O factor for enrolment, is the question going to be whether I have any restrictions for any MOC or is there some lesser condition saying that while I may not meet some of the MOC specific requirements for infantry, I could meet the requirements for Artillery/MARS/LogO and most/almost all other MOCs? Perhaps it isn’t even that structured and is more of a subjective evaluation.
So back to the original question, how does the medical staff (in CFRC and Borden) evaluate the potential recruit in assessing whether the candidate meets the O factor in the CEMS?
PS-Yes, I know that the only way to get a final answer is to apply but I am looking for some unofficial insight into how the CEMS is applied.
All helpful comments appreciated
thx
My question relates to the occupation factor in the CEMS (common enrolment medical standard). I understand that the point of the CEMS is to make sure that the candidate is employable in as many possible MOCs and to make sure the candidate has maximum chance for success. It seems to me that any orthopaedic injuries would generally be assessed under the O factor. For existing CF members, the task statements for each MOCs provide guidelines on the occupational demands that may be impacted by any injury or condition and help to therefore guide an evaluation to potential limitations for that member, in his/her MOC. However, how is this assessed in the CEMS? For example, in my case, should I assume that the nature of my injury must not limit me from the most punishing of tasks among all MOCs (probably NCM Infantry)? If I were to be naive, I might say "well as long as I pass the Generic Task statement, I should be OK" but I presume I would be wrong there.
Why I am trying to get insight into this is that although my injury is permanent (15 years old now and includes permanent nerve damage) and has a significant impact (I cannot balance on my right foot and generally wear an ankle brace), I have had no reinjury issues (even after 3 years of rugby) and it has not reduced my running/hiking abilities. It would likely be an issue in say carrying a 35kg pack through the Afghan mountains or in parachuting (it’s not the fall, it’s the sudden stop at the end that gets you). In just about anything else, I’m confident in being able to do anything requested of me, without limitation. So in assessing the O factor for enrolment, is the question going to be whether I have any restrictions for any MOC or is there some lesser condition saying that while I may not meet some of the MOC specific requirements for infantry, I could meet the requirements for Artillery/MARS/LogO and most/almost all other MOCs? Perhaps it isn’t even that structured and is more of a subjective evaluation.
So back to the original question, how does the medical staff (in CFRC and Borden) evaluate the potential recruit in assessing whether the candidate meets the O factor in the CEMS?
PS-Yes, I know that the only way to get a final answer is to apply but I am looking for some unofficial insight into how the CEMS is applied.
All helpful comments appreciated
thx

