• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Chinese Military,Political and Social Superthread

8,000km range for something that isn't even carrying a nuclear weapon is nuts, and going to change things significantly if it holds up after the usual sprinkling of CCP propaganda is stripped away.

 
8,000km range for something that isn't even carrying a nuclear weapon is nuts, and going to change things significantly if it holds up after the usual sprinkling of CCP propaganda is stripped away.

Here's the rub. China isn't claiming any of this. The Pentagon is. China is just saying "yah we have a new ballistic missile that goes far".

So CCP propaganda has nothing to do with it.
 
Here's the rub. China isn't claiming any of this. The Pentagon is. China is just saying "yah we have a new ballistic missile that goes far".

So CCP propaganda has nothing to do with it.
How much of this is Pentagon exaggeration?
 
How much of this is Pentagon exaggeration?
I dunno, they essentially gutted their intelligence services with all the DOGE stuff and political purges. Or it might be sensationalism like what used to grip them during the Cold War where the constantly overestimated Russia's technical abilities. Or it might be perfectly accurate.
 
Are these signs that China may be getting more serious about a military action against Taiwan?




Meanwhile they are taking actions which could potentially hide military preparations from observation:


 
China's war on the west.


"Two years before the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, two senior military officers in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) published the book Unrestricted Warfare (1999). They argued that to defeat a technologically superior opponent, an inferior power must erase the boundaries between the battlefield and civilian life and pursue a modern, asymmetric strategy. “The first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, and nothing is forbidden,” the authors wrote. A frontal assault on the battlefield would be suicide. But attacking the enemy’s currency, flooding his country with illegal narcotics, attacking his cultural and governance institutions through fostering social discord, and undermining his confidence through false media narratives and psychological operations can achieve national goals without ever crossing the kinetic ceiling. This kind of war is permanent and omnipresent—it happens simultaneously in the financial, legal, digital, and psychological domains. And yet, a regime that treats individuals as automaton gearworks is defenseless against an unapologetically American system of free-moving energy. What follows is part two in a series of conversations with entrepreneur and designer Ross Calvin on the future of global politics, the Chinese Communist Party, and how the West will overcome machine age psychology."



Part II - China
Part I - Europe

....
 
China has now surpassed Russia in the size of their nuclear submarine fleets...and construction continues at pace with new designs coming online.

 
China's war on the west.


"Two years before the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, two senior military officers in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) published the book Unrestricted Warfare (1999). They argued that to defeat a technologically superior opponent, an inferior power must erase the boundaries between the battlefield and civilian life and pursue a modern, asymmetric strategy. “The first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, and nothing is forbidden,” the authors wrote. A frontal assault on the battlefield would be suicide. But attacking the enemy’s currency, flooding his country with illegal narcotics, attacking his cultural and governance institutions through fostering social discord, and undermining his confidence through false media narratives and psychological operations can achieve national goals without ever crossing the kinetic ceiling. This kind of war is permanent and omnipresent—it happens simultaneously in the financial, legal, digital, and psychological domains. And yet, a regime that treats individuals as automaton gearworks is defenseless against an unapologetically American system of free-moving energy. What follows is part two in a series of conversations with entrepreneur and designer Ross Calvin on the future of global politics, the Chinese Communist Party, and how the West will overcome machine age psychology."



Part II - China
Part I - Europe

....

Maoism enters the chat...

Mao Zedong: Revolutionary Strategies and Peasant Mobilization

Mao Zedong’s revolutionary strategies and theories significantly reshaped China and left a lasting legacy on global revolutionary movements. His ability to adapt Marxism to the specific conditions of China, prioritize the peasantry, and employ effective military and mass mobilization strategies were crucial to the success of the Chinese Communist Revolution. Moreover, his theoretical contributions on contradictions and practice provided a philosophical grounding for his practical actions.

Mao’s impact extended far beyond China’s borders, influencing numerous revolutionary movements across Afro-Asia. His emphasis on continuous revolution and the need to address both antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions remain relevant in contemporary discussions on social and political change.


 
Maoism enters the chat...

Mao Zedong: Revolutionary Strategies and Peasant Mobilization

Mao Zedong’s revolutionary strategies and theories significantly reshaped China and left a lasting legacy on global revolutionary movements. His ability to adapt Marxism to the specific conditions of China, prioritize the peasantry, and employ effective military and mass mobilization strategies were crucial to the success of the Chinese Communist Revolution. Moreover, his theoretical contributions on contradictions and practice provided a philosophical grounding for his practical actions.

Mao’s impact extended far beyond China’s borders, influencing numerous revolutionary movements across Afro-Asia. His emphasis on continuous revolution and the need to address both antagonistic and non-antagonistic contradictions remain relevant in contemporary discussions on social and political change.


all without mentioning the hundreds of thousands that he starved or caused to be murdered in order to achieve compliance. The current leadership is no better, they just dress better
 
So if Mao's and Alinsky's acolytes aim to tie us up in knots with our own red tape, tie us to our own rules, what is to be done?

1768341521982.jpeg

The Gordian priests were horrified at the disrespectful and violent act. But it resolved the issue.

I am probably a fool, and more trusting than I should be, but I choose to believe that Trump is more capitalist than authoritarian. An asshole, yes. Untrustworthy , absolutely. Lacking respect for norms, again absolutely.

But I continue to think that his aim is to disrupt a system that was working against the founding principles. The liberal system was being exploited by illiberal people to illiberal ends. They want to control the timing and extent of the disruption of our society to futher their goals, to sap our society.

The way you disrupt a sap is to counter-sap.

Do I know that this is what this is? No But I think that what we are seeing might look a lot like that.

I find it better to hope than to worry.
 
So, end of the year, how is China doing, the linchpin in the BRICS, Shanghai and CRINK-V systems?

Exports are up but Growth and Investments are down.







Overall?


The country is surviving but the people may be struggling.

That hasn't been a good formula recently, in any country.
 
all without mentioning the hundreds of thousands that he starved or caused to be murdered in order to achieve compliance. The current leadership is no better, they just dress better
Millions. The only worser one I can think of is Stalin closely followed by dear old Pol Pot.
 
Some interesting word choices in PMMCs opening comments here.

Paraphrased but a strategic partnership in the new world order.

 
And also, while we are focused on Greenland and Venezuela


"I believe any action involving the use of force, such as China deploying naval ships, can only be described as a survival-threatening situation," she replied.

The phrase "survival-threatening situation" is a benchmark necessary for Japanese military involvement.

Since then, Beijing has tried to make an example of her.

China issued travel warnings against Japan, calling on nationals to refrain from visiting due to "serious" safety risks.

That resulted in some 500,000 travellers cancelling their plane tickets.

Two Japanese films have also been pulled from the box office and, most recently, China again suspended seafood imports from Japan.

What Takaichi said in parliament wasn't incorrect. The trouble was she that said the quiet part out loud.

....

This next one is a long read - but well worth the effort. Not just yelling at clouds.

An appreciation of China's position on the rising in Iran and the possibility of US involvement.

One word - insecurity.

 
And in London - China has been pushing hard to get a Mega Embassy in London at a site once occupied by the Royal Mint, adjacent to the City and with easy access to all the cables linking London's financial markets to the rest of the world.

Starmer has been trying hard to find a way to say yes but parliament, Lords and Commons, government and opposition, is rebelling.



The Government has repeatedly refused to designate China as a national security threat on the same level as Russia and Iran.

Labour MPs want China labelled a threat.

But Starmer wants to do business with China and refuses to do so.
Much like our PM.

"Mr Pennycook refused to describe China as a threat, insisting that the Government’s position on the country “cannot be boiled down to one word”.

He said: “We recognise that China poses a series of threats to UK national security and we challenge these robustly.

“China also presents opportunities to the UK as the world’s second-largest economy and the world’s third-largest trading partner. We will therefore continue to develop a consistent and pragmatic approach to economic engagement without compromising our national security.”

The Government has repeatedly refused to designate China as a national security threat on the same level as Russia and Iran."
 
 
Back
Top