• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Chinese Military,Political and Social Superthread


Just hold on Taiwan. I'll be right with you. Just as soon as I can find some Generals that can actually do the job.
 
A bit of a look inside. Apparently the military has been quiet, which is unusual as they are generally quick to toe whatever party line is being broadcast.



But now gunfire in Beijing. This is going to shake up the CCP quite a bit, it may be very good for Taiwan or bad.

 
PLAN submarines already operating in the Arctic, according to this article…

 
Anyone read this interesting piece of information?


China’s Top General Accused of Giving Nuclear Secrets to U.S.​

Bribery allegations have also been leveled against Gen. Zhang Youxia, whose downfall carries implications for the country’s military readiness​


China’s senior-most general is accused of leaking information about the country’s nuclear-weapons program to the U.S. and accepting bribes for official acts, including the promotion of an officer to defense minister, said people familiar with a high-level briefing on the allegations.
 


.....

Starmer risks becoming another Westerner who has swallowed yesterday’s story of China​

The Prime Minister should not be misguided – Beijing is already in economic decline
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

International Business Editor
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is the International Business Editor of The Telegraph

Sir Keir Starmer is late to the Chinese economic miracle.

Hyper-growth was already on borrowed time as far back as 2010, undermined by debt saturation and the insidious long-tail effects of the global financial crisis.

China’s share of world GDP has fallen for the last four years at market exchange rates. Capital Economics expects it to fall again this year, touching lows seen almost a decade ago.

China’s output has already fallen back from three quarters to two thirds of US levels. It will not surpass the US over the next half century – assuming that Congress and the American people act in time to halt the dangerous buffoonery and predatory wag-the-dog wars of Donald Trump. Talk of a superpower sorpasso is now just a relic of past hubris.

....communist China is pursuing a mercantilist policy of strategic autarky and one-way trade in much the same way as the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) before it*. China’s trade surplus hit a record $1.2tn (£870bn) last year.

Goldman Sachs says the surplus has reached 1pc of global GDP, the highest ever by any nation in known economic history. It is an even larger percentage than during the China Shock 1.0, which so destabilised the world economy in the early 2000s and so pauperised blue collar workers in Western democracies.




.... US response?


"We will deter China in the Indo-Pacific through strength, not confrontation."
Translation?
We will outcompete China economically?




.....




Drug experts from the EU have told The Telegraph how traffickers conceal Chinese chemicals in containers labelled “electronic goods” or innocuous shipments of goods such as PVC plastic. They then exploit legitimate land, air and sea routes to send them to the gangs.

Specialist fraudsters are deployed to bypass customs and export checks at the borders with doctored paperwork, sources said.

....

* The Qing Dynasty was the dynasty that caused the Century of Humiliation that exercises Xi so much.

Europe became addicted, literally, to tea. They bought all the necessary paraphernalia as well, tea cups, pots, matching sugar bowls and milk pitchers, blue willow crockery.....

And Europe went broke because China would only accept silver.

So Britain stole their tea plants and started growing it themselves in India and started selling opium to the Chinese to recover the silver they had spent on their tea addiction.

Now China seems bent on swapping fentanyl for opium.


....

More from AEP

China is doubling down on its worst pathologies. A full two decades after the regime promised to curtail extreme over-investment – and instead let the Chinese people enjoy the fruits of their labour – it is still building more excess plant and manufacturing capacity that the world cannot absorb.

This has pushed its investment ratio off charts to 40.5pc of GDP. Other Asian tigers never came close to this level.

“Economic growth is being powered almost entirely by investment, despite diminishing returns and escalating debt,” says Mark Williams, head of Asia at Capital Economics. He expects China’s true rate of trend growth to fall to 2pc by the late 2020s.

Documents from the Communist Party School leave no doubt that the purpose of this maniacal industrial strategy is to mobilise technological change to overthrow the capitalist global order – but while this goal is rooted in modern Marxist doctrine, we could almost be talking about the early 1840s.

As America’s John Quincy Adams wrote at the time – in defence of Britain – the First Opium War was not about opium but rather about the refusal of China to “hold commercial intercourse with the rest of mankind upon terms of equal reciprocity”.

China was exporting but refusing to import, sucking the world’s silver currency into a deflationary black hole. Sound familiar?
 
Weak economy, Trumpian uncertainty, proclamations of policy reversals, rumours of deposed generals being rescued amid reports of gunshots....

Sounds stable.
 
 
Interesting if the letter is genuine, Zhang appears to be someone uninterested in war with the West. Also not impressed with Xi personality cult fixation.

 
Bad staffer, BAD staffer!

Court docs attached.
 

Attachments

Bad staffer, BAD staffer!

Court docs attached.

From awhile ago but FWIW...

China 'compromised' Canadian government networks and stole valuable info: spy agency

China-sponsored threat actors have infiltrated at least 20 networks associated with federal government: CSE

 
Unless this changes dramatically, China is likely to win the AI race. AI is about turning electrons into bits. And they make more electrons than anybody else. And well the 21st century is defined by electrification. So that needs electrons too.....

VCE_Electrical-Generation-Worldwide-2014-2024_Website_02102026-1.webp


To some extent Carney seems to understand the above. But his pledge to double electricity production by 2050 is too far away. At minimum, given our economy, geography and climate we should be able to overtake Russia with production and consumption.

 
A good reason why some of that NATO 5% spending should go into increased counterintelligence and cyber security.

🍻

If it's included in NATO's definition, it's getting funding. And counterint and cyber security is.
 
Unless this changes dramatically, China is likely to win the AI race. AI is about turning electrons into bits. And they make more electrons than anybody else. And well the 21st century is defined by electrification. So that needs electrons too.....

VCE_Electrical-Generation-Worldwide-2014-2024_Website_02102026-1.webp


To some extent Carney seems to understand the above. But his pledge to double electricity production by 2050 is too far away. At minimum, given our economy, geography and climate we should be able to overtake Russia with production and consumption.

a new coal fired generator coming on line in China as I write this. I can't help wondering if the Chinese gamed this a decade ago; bankrupt us with windmills and carbon concerns and decimate our industry while doing it. Then shame us into shutting down our electric generation system whilst selling us the very weapons that are destroying us
 
Unless this changes dramatically, China is likely to win the AI race. AI is about turning electrons into bits. And they make more electrons than anybody else. And well the 21st century is defined by electrification. So that needs electrons too.....

VCE_Electrical-Generation-Worldwide-2014-2024_Website_02102026-1.webp


To some extent Carney seems to understand the above. But his pledge to double electricity production by 2050 is too far away. At minimum, given our economy, geography and climate we should be able to overtake Russia with production and consumption.

I'm not sure generating a lot more power would make a difference - we'd just use it all for generating Bitcoins. (Sarcasm - for anyone who missed it)

Southern Ontario first became an major player in heavy industry because of cheap power. We still have power, but it's far from cheap.

What's the status on the SMR Action Plan? - is anything going forward besides Darlington?

🍻
 
I'm not sure generating a lot more power would make a difference - we'd just use it all for generating Bitcoins. (Sarcasm - for anyone who missed it)

Southern Ontario first became an major player in heavy industry because of cheap power. We still have power, but it's far from cheap.

What's the status on the SMR Action Plan? - is anything going forward besides Darlington?

🍻

Proceeding at a good rate:

10GW more for OPG NPP set to be worlds largest upon completion.

And G7’s first SMR broke ground in 2022:
 
a new coal fired generator coming on line in China as I write this. I can't help wondering if the Chinese gamed this a decade ago; bankrupt us with windmills and carbon concerns and decimate our industry while doing it. Then shame us into shutting down our electric generation system whilst selling us the very weapons that are destroying us

This argument is getting tired. China is an "all of the above" builder. Yes, they build coal plants. Most of that is recapitalizing what they have. And the utilization rate is dropping as that capacity increasingly becomes a seasonal resource. Their actual capacity growth? Solar, wind, nuclear

Solar. They have the ability to manufacture 1 TW of panels per year. For reference the entire US grid is 1.25 TW. They installed over 300GW last year. The EU installed 65 GW. The US installed 31 GW.

Wind. China installed 119 GW last year. EU installed 14.5 GW. The US added 8.1 GW.

Nuclear. China has 32 GW under construction right now with over 30 reactors. I don't think the US has any reactors under construction. With less than 2 GW being recapitalized. Same for the EU.

Ideology and talking points aren't going to win the strategic competition. While ideologues are focused on winning Internet arguments, China laps everybody else with actual deployment every single year.
 
Back
Top