• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CIA director David Petraeus resigns citing extramarital affair.

Petraeus has been under investigation by the FBI for two years. That's a long, long investigation to hold over someones head (his other head got him in trouble anyway).

His investigation keeps his mouth shut re Benghazi. Concupiscence, I mean coincidence of course.
 
Politico reports that Gen (ret'd) Petraeus has pled guilty to the mishandling of information charge and that a plea deal ~ no jail time ~ has been agreed.

Politicpo suggests this is part of a carefully orchestrated "rehab" scheme ... "Petraeus has edged back into the limelight by making speeches, joining universities and authoring bullish op-ed columns – including one last year for POLITICO Magazine. He has taken a lucrative job as the head of the “global institute” for a private equity fund in New York City. But the federal investigation into his release of secrets to biographer Paula Broadwell has hung over him like a shadow, carrying with it the prospect of an embarrassing trial and even prison time."

The PR "spin" just never ends in official Washington; ditto in official Ottawa I'm afraid.

 
Reports in the news on the way home say he's likely to get a $40K fine, no jail time and 2 years probation. Maximum would be $100K and 1 year in jail.
 
Probably the most expensive date he's ever had. And the bills will probably still be piling up if the wife decides to take her pound of flesh and flush him.
 
When a man steals your wife, there is no better revenge than to let him keep her.

SACHA GUITRY, attributed

Read more at http://www.notable-quotes.com/a/adultery_quotes.html#BOHOXLFi3RSDOffw.99
 
Now, according to reports (gossip?) in The Daily Beast  Secretary of Defense Ash Carter "is considering retroactively demoting retired Gen. David Petraeus after he admitted to giving classified information to his biographer and mistress while he was still in uniform," as part of a larger programme aimed at putting "the clamp down on misbehaving generals."  :tsktsk:

 
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/18/exclusive-pentagon-may-demote-david-petraeus.html

01.18.164:53 PM ET

Exclusive: Pentagon May Demote David Petraeus

The defense secretary is looking to clamp down on misbehaving generals. Pentagon insiders say Petraeus could be the next general to face the consequences.

The Pentagon is considering retroactively demoting retired Gen. David Petraeus after he admitted to giving classified information to his biographer and mistress while he was still in uniform, three people with knowledge of the matter told The Daily Beast.

The decision now rests with Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, who is said to be willing to consider overruling an earlier recommendation by the Army that Petraeus not have his rank reduced. Such a demotion could cost the storied general hundreds of thousands of dollars—and deal an additional blow to his once-pristine reputation.

“The secretary is considering going in a different direction” from the Army, a defense official told The Daily Beast, because he wants to be consistent in his treatment of senior officers who engage in misconduct and to send a message that even men of Petraeus’s fame and esteemed reputation are not immune to punishment.

Pentagon spokesperson Peter Cook told The Daily Beast that Carter had requested the information ex-Army Secretary John McHugh had when he made his recommendation on the matter, before reaching a final decision. McHugh had recommended taking no action against Petraeus.

“The Department of the Army is still in the process of providing the secretary with information relevant to former‎ Secretary McHugh’s recommendation,” Cook told The Daily Beast. “Once the secretary‎ has an opportunity to consider this information, he will make his decision about next steps, if any, in this matter.”

Carter could also recommend other actions that don’t result in Petraeus losing his fourth star. Or the defense secretary could simply allow the Army’s previous recommendations to stand.

Petraeus, arguably the most well-known and revered military officer of his generation, retired from the Army in 2011 with the rank of a four-star general, the highest rank an Army officer can achieve. If Carter decides to strip Petraeus of his fourth star, he could be demoted to the last rank at which he “satisfactorily” served, according to military regulations.

Reducing Petraeus’s rank, most likely to lieutenant general, could mean he’d have to pay back the difference in pension payments and other benefits that he received as a retired four-star general. That would amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars over his retirement. According to Pentagon figures, a four-star general with roughly the same years of experience as Petraeus was entitled to receive a yearly pension of nearly $220,000. A three-star officer would receive about $170,000.

Petraeus didn’t respond to a request for comment.

But the financial pain to Petraeus isn’t likely to be severe. He has confided to friends and acquaintances that he’s making a hefty sum from his job at a private equity firm and through speaking fees.

The demotion in rank would be a bigger, lasting blow, and take from Petraeus the rare achievement he’d set his eyes on many years ago.

At any given time, there are only 12 four-star generals in the Army, the largest of the services. By the time he was a colonel, in the mid-1990s, many thought Petraeus was destined to be one of them.

The reduction in Petraeus’s rank could force him to pay back hundreds of thousands of dollars in pension payments. But the the bigger blow would be to his reputation.

The U.S. military has, on several occasions, demoted generals, increasingly for improper personal contact and not for poor battlefield decisions. But rarely does it demote four-star generals, in part because there are so few of them. It’s also more common to reduce the rank of more junior officers than of top generals.

If Petraeus were demoted, it would mark another spectacular fall. Petraeus stepped down as director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell, a writer and current Army reservist, was revealed. At the time, Petraeus had been frequently mentioned as a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2016.

Petraeus pleaded guilty last year to giving Broadwell eight notebooks that he compiled while serving as commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and that he knew contained classified information. The notebooks held some of the most sensitive kinds of military and intelligence secrets, including the identities of covert officers, intelligence capabilities, quotes from high-level meetings of the National Security Council, and notes about Petraeus’s discussions with President Obama.
 
Another turn of events from the woman who started the whole ball rolling.

Lawyers bail on Florida woman in Petraeus saga

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/03/jill-kelley-david-petraeus-lawyers-220982

The lawyers for a Florida woman who claims her privacy was invaded during federal investigations into former Central Intelligence Agency Director David Petraeus are seeking to drop out of her lawsuit against the government, new court filings show.

Jill Kelley filed the Privacy Act lawsuit in 2013, charging that the FBI and Pentagon leaked personal information about her — including messages from her personal email account — after she triggered federal probes that led investigators to uncover Petraeus' extramarital affair with biographer Paula Broadwell. The inquiries also set in motion Petraeus' resignation in November 2012 and his guilty plea last February to a charge of mishandling classified information.

Kelley and her husband, Dr. Scott Kelley, retained a leading privacy attorney, Alan Raul of Chicago-based law firm Sidley Austin, to bring the high-profile suit against the federal government.

However, in a court motion filed under seal Wednesday and partially released Friday, Raul and other Sidley lawyers asked U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson to excuse them from the case. The edited version of the motion made public on Friday is vague about the attorneys' reason for begging off the suit, but refers to "irreconcilable differences between the lawyer and client."
The motion also notes that D.C. legal rules say lawyers "shall withdraw if 'the representation will result in violation of the rules of professional conduct or other law.'" However, it's unclear whether the attorneys were saying that scenario had actually played out.

The withdrawal request followed a proposal from the Kelleys' side that the U.S. government pay $4.35 million to settle the suit, The Associated Press reported Friday.

The feds apparently rejected the offer.

Kelley, who organized social events with top officials at Central Command in Tampa, went to the FBI after receiving emails from an unfamiliar address that she found threatening and which appeared to indicate a familiarity with the movements of top military leaders and Petraeus.

Raul declined to comment Friday. Jill Kelley did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment. She is preparing to publish a book on the saga, entitled "Collateral Damage," the New York Post reported Wednesday.

Jackson threw out much of the suit in 2014, but allowed the Privacy Act claim over leaks to proceed. After the judge rejected the Kelleys' effort to get testimony from former Pentagon general counsel and current Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, the Kelleys subpoenaed nine reporters last year to ask them about their sources for stories about the episode. It is unclear whether any of the journalists were questioned.
 
And, now, Jill Kelly has a book: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/03/tell-all-book-exposes-petraeus-emails-221278

90


 
Paula Broadwell says she screwed up.  In other surprising news, Donald Trump is running for President.  :facepalm:

Paula Broadwell to NYT: I screwed up

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/paula-broadwell-new-york-times-david-petraeus-223686

Three years after Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director and apologized to Congress for an affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell now asks, “how long does a person pay for their mistake?”

“I’m the first to admit I screwed up. Really badly, I know that,” Broadwell told the New York Times in a profile published Saturday.

An FBI investigation in 2012 revealed that Petraeus had an affair with Broadwell, who had co-authored the four-star general’s biography, “All In: The Education of General David Petraeus.” Petraeus was later sentenced to two years' probation and fined after pleading guilty to mishandling classified information, some of which he had shared with Broadwell.

The Times’ profile contrasts Broadwell's struggle to return to a life of normalcy against Petraeus' efforts to bounce back from his fall from a storied military career, including leading the so-called "surge" strategy in Iraq in 2007.

Broadwell told the Times she keeps busy by volunteering for advocacy groups as well as for women in combat, being particularly active in a group called West Point Women. Broadwell was married at the time of the affair, and she and her husband are still together. They have two young boys.

Petraeus frequently publishes opinion pieces in prominent publications, and is affiliated with three universities, the Times reported. He was mentioned as a potential draft challenger for an outside party bid for the 2016 presidency in a column published in the Washington Post, among others.

Broadwell has attempted to convince the Associated Press to not use the word “mistress,” suggesting some words reflect mistakes made by two people, not just one. This, she said, has given her a reason to help others.

“On the one hand, I don’t want to define myself by this. But on the other hand, I’ve been defined by this,” she said. “So if I can change things for the better because of it, then why not?”
 
...and Edward Snowden is still in exile and Chelsea Manning is still in jail.  Same offence, radically different treatment.
 
dapaterson said:
...and Edward Snowden is still in exile and Chelsea Manning is still in jail.  Same offence, radically different treatment.
Hey, hey, hey - take your factiness over to rabble.ca, buddy  ;D
 
Back
Top