• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CSIS says OBL Out to Procure Nuclear Weapons

muskrat89

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Inactive
Reaction score
18
Points
530
What a Surprise  ::)



http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/11/5/83946.shtml

Friday, Nov. 5, 2004 8:29 a.m. EST

Canadian Intelligence Warns of bin Laden's Nuclear Intentions


Canada's intelligence service has concluded that Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida network have one priority: obtain briefcase-sized nuclear weapons.

The Canadian Press reports this week that a newly published intelligence report is not sure if bin Laden has obtained such weapons. But the Islamic terror group is clearly trying to do so.

"The assessment revives concerns that emerged as early as 1992 when Stanislav Lunev, a former Russian military intelligence officer, claimed his country's intelligence services had lost many of the portable, backpack-style devices, which weigh about 55 kilograms."
The Candian report, issued in June 2004, was headlined "Al-Qaida Possessing Russian Nuclear Briefcases: Fiction or Fact?"

The CP said the briefing document was compiled by Canada's national security threat assessment center, part of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

The heavily censored document offered some chilling statements.

"Al-Qaida is interested in acquiring nuclear capabilities in order to expand its attack arsenal," the report claimed.

The CP said there is also anecdotal evidence that al-Qaida may have obtained such weapons.

"Earlier this year, Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir said al-Qaida may already possess portable nuclear weapons. He attributed the claim to a 2001 interview with bin Laden's second-in-command, Ayman Al-Zawahri, in which the al-Qaida figure said the group had purchased such bombs on the black market in central Asia for $30 million U.S."

 
ah great!
I guess I'll have to compleate my bunker.
To Do list:
1.Do laundry
2.wash car
3.compleate fall out shelter
4.mow lawn
5.make peace with god
 
This is why the Bush Doctrine which threatens action on nations for merely allowing terrorist funding is so important.

Anything can be bought for the right price and Al Qaeda must be separated from their oil sheikh sponsors.



Matthew.   :salute:
 
I agree wholeheartedly ... but by this logic, the U.S. should have invaded Saudi Arabia, not Iraq.
 
GGboy said:
I agree wholeheartedly ... but by this logic, the U.S. should have invaded Saudi Arabia, not Iraq.

I think the Saudi's have very much moved themselves into the crosshairs due to their lack of cooperation.  As an example there is no way the Jordanians would be flying the Hashemite Flag at Aqaba without US approval.



Matthew.  :salute:
 
This is why the Bush Doctrine which threatens action on nations for merely allowing terrorist funding is so important.
Saudi Arabia? Hell they need to invade Canada!
 
As it stands Iraq has a great deal of history behind it, Baghdad is one of the oldest and most respected cities in th Muslim world, it was the seat of a large empire etc. etc. Howevere, there are still a great many muslims, a large majority, who while they might feel a connection to the people of Iraq will not do anything serious about it because hell Saddam was bad and IRaq in the big picture has little spirital meaning for the majority of Muslims (though the Shi'i Retain many shrines there so perahps that is unfair)
However Saudiyah is home to the center of the Muslim world, Mecca as well as the second most important city. Medinah.
Presumably any large scale incursion into Saudiya would involve many troops going to Mecca, what's worse many fighters would seek refuge in mecca, drawing even more fighting, large scale bombardment etc towards it.
Now, Baghdad is somewhat unimportant, but an invasion of Mecca or Saudiyah in general, I submit, would instananeously polarise all but the least (And I mean very very least) devout Muslims.
So, the West does have a great deal of support right now from the Muslim community believe it or not, but that support would become opposition, outright opposition to any Western Advance in the Middle East if Mecca were bombed, invaded or otherwise desecrated.

Any end to the Saudiyah government would have to be from within (even that is unlikely sadly, I don't like the Sauds one bit) as any incursion from the outside wouldn't be seen as an attack on the Sauds but as an attack on Islam, and not just by the few extremists, but by an awful lot more.

I just picture and awful lot of death resulting from an invasion of Saudi Arabia not just there either, and on a HUGE scale.
And I think at some point you have to ask when the actions outweigh the end.
 
Back
Top