- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
E.R. Campbell said:The POTUS should have and could have sent the Congress a budget that served the people's needs: major cuts to unaffordable 'entitlements,' major cuts to the defence budget - including, probably, a strategic plan to disengage from West Asia and, yes, < gasp > a new, national VAT, modeled on Canada's reasonably (not perfectly, not even well) structured HST. That would have been leading. Instead Obama choses to play politics - to fiddle while America burns.
Look, Bush was not a good president, he wasn't even just an OK president; but Obama is not any, not one iota, better.
Political irresponsibility in the USA has reached epic proportions - amongst both the Democrats and the Republicans, including some/many/most of the Tea Party people.
Obama is America's Pierre Trudeau - a dilettante; someone, additionally, who has, in the great Isiah Berlin's model, the intellectual characteristics of a hedgehog: one "big" idea that precludes considering lesser things, like the economy or the national interest. For Trudeau it was destructive nationalism - something which never, much, existed in Canada, hors de Québec; for Obama it is redressing some of the grievances of poor, urban, black Americans. Trudeau managed to reduce Canada from a prosperous, 'leading' middle power to a debt ridden international lightweight (in fairness, he didn't do it alone and Mulroney did not reverse the "project' when he could have done so - Canadians liked Trudeau's vision, poisonous to their own best interests though it was); Obama may do the same for America; charisma is a terrible thing.
I agree with much of this - as I suggested in the post responding to Haletown, the problems facing the USA are broad, and they need a lot of bold - and likely extremely unpopular, some would say politically suicidal moves to accomplish - including a VAT of some sort for example - a move which allowed Canada to deal with its budget problems. In fact, when we look at the deficit we face now, the two GST cuts made by the Harper government, which did little to improve the position of the vast majority of Canadians, seem silly. I did a little bit of math a while back on how much those cuts did for me in terms of my actual disposable income (and I make a pretty good amount of money), and it was negligible. In many cases, retailers just sucked up the difference on a lot of small ticket items anyhow, and even with the income I have, a big chunk of it goes to things like my mortgage and groceries, or into long term savings, and what's left at the end that's "discretionary spending" accounts for not a tremendous savings. It certainly didn't have any stimulative effect in terms of changing my consumption preferences - but the aggregate impact on the federal budget was still large. I'd have been content with large surpluses paying down the national debt over a cut - or at least, an income tax cut - ideally in the form of raising the basic personal exemption.
Obama was elected, in part at least, as sort of a "pendulum" effect. He was charismatic when the nation needed it - but I think a large part of his shortcomings come from the reality that many had unrealistic expectations about what he could actually accomplish in the political reality of the US.