Disability decision letter
- Thread starter koreankid
- Start date
- Status
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 210
It will depend on how much information is contained in the letter, and where the text falls.
Why is this important? Are you missing the last page of your decision letter?
Why is this important? Are you missing the last page of your decision letter?
My disability decision letter isn't done in letter form like the 2 decisions I found online where the text ends and the signature is directly underneath it. mine is done differently and the signature is by itself on a separate end page.
the adjudicator has made over 15 intentional errors in my adjudication, and the signature has been altered from the 2 I found online from the same adjudicator. my lawyer thinks my adjudication has been done off record as there are no signed copies in my ATIP files, 2 1/2 months I have tried to get these signed documents verified by VAC and they won't respond by phone, email, or letter, my federal MP won't send these documents to VAC for verification, and I have found many unsigned documents by pension officers in my ATIP documents. My lawyer figures that no one wants their signatures on any documents for liability reasons in civil court.My lawyer feels that the adjudicator has not given me a "fair adjudication" with regards to legislation and policy or the right to fair procedure and that may be why the signature has been altered so when we take the adjudicator to court to verify her signature and decision documents she can say its not her signature or adjudication to avoid being sued in civil court for her actions.
This is why I need to look at an up to date decision letter from another vet or cf personnel to caompare and know for sure. The 2 I found online are older ones from 2004 and 2007 and the format is totally different than I have.
If anyone can show me a copy of their decision letter, I would be the most appreciative of this and they can black out all their personal information as I only need to see the format of the letter and signature.
the other 2 I have found on line are at:
cansav.ca/12%20Jan%202007.pdf. and the other one is at: bluewaternavy.org/LFVAC%20pg3.jpg
Some help with this would make my year long battle worth it.I am spending about $30,000 to go to court to expose VA for everyones benefit as well as mine. Don't want what is happening to me to happen to the next guy. Never give up and fight to the end.
the adjudicator has made over 15 intentional errors in my adjudication, and the signature has been altered from the 2 I found online from the same adjudicator. my lawyer thinks my adjudication has been done off record as there are no signed copies in my ATIP files, 2 1/2 months I have tried to get these signed documents verified by VAC and they won't respond by phone, email, or letter, my federal MP won't send these documents to VAC for verification, and I have found many unsigned documents by pension officers in my ATIP documents. My lawyer figures that no one wants their signatures on any documents for liability reasons in civil court.My lawyer feels that the adjudicator has not given me a "fair adjudication" with regards to legislation and policy or the right to fair procedure and that may be why the signature has been altered so when we take the adjudicator to court to verify her signature and decision documents she can say its not her signature or adjudication to avoid being sued in civil court for her actions.
This is why I need to look at an up to date decision letter from another vet or cf personnel to caompare and know for sure. The 2 I found online are older ones from 2004 and 2007 and the format is totally different than I have.
If anyone can show me a copy of their decision letter, I would be the most appreciative of this and they can black out all their personal information as I only need to see the format of the letter and signature.
the other 2 I have found on line are at:
cansav.ca/12%20Jan%202007.pdf. and the other one is at: bluewaternavy.org/LFVAC%20pg3.jpg
Some help with this would make my year long battle worth it.I am spending about $30,000 to go to court to expose VA for everyones benefit as well as mine. Don't want what is happening to me to happen to the next guy. Never give up and fight to the end.
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 210
The format was recently changed, in an effort to meet Treasury Board and other guidelines to contain clear and concise language, etc. Tt has changed more than once in the last five to six years, as well.
I have a file on my desk right now, with four decisions in it, from May 2014 to July 2015. Three of the decisions (all in 2015) are preceded by a cover letter, containing a basic explanation of the decision itself. There is no signature block on the cover letter. Attached to each of the three cover letters are the decisions themselves (Departmental Review, Assessment Decision, and Official Decision). Each of the actual decisions has a signature block at the end. Neither is on a separate page from the remainder of the text of the decision, and each page is numbered at the top.
The other Assessment Decision, from May 2014, has no cover letter, but it does have a signature block at the end of the letter. It is not on a separate page; rather, it flows "naturally" from the main body of the letter.
If the 2004 and 2007 letters were both signed by the same person, I wouldn't find it surprising if it changed over the three-year span...specially if they are signing more than one letter a day, as the Adjudicators would be...
It's like signing rent cheques for the year...not going to be the same from cheque #001 to #012.
I have a file on my desk right now, with four decisions in it, from May 2014 to July 2015. Three of the decisions (all in 2015) are preceded by a cover letter, containing a basic explanation of the decision itself. There is no signature block on the cover letter. Attached to each of the three cover letters are the decisions themselves (Departmental Review, Assessment Decision, and Official Decision). Each of the actual decisions has a signature block at the end. Neither is on a separate page from the remainder of the text of the decision, and each page is numbered at the top.
The other Assessment Decision, from May 2014, has no cover letter, but it does have a signature block at the end of the letter. It is not on a separate page; rather, it flows "naturally" from the main body of the letter.
If the 2004 and 2007 letters were both signed by the same person, I wouldn't find it surprising if it changed over the three-year span...specially if they are signing more than one letter a day, as the Adjudicators would be...
It's like signing rent cheques for the year...not going to be the same from cheque #001 to #012.
thanks for the info, mine is the official decision letter which interests me. Is there any chance of you copying it blacking out all the information on the whole document and letting me view the format. I would really appreciate it.Mine is not even in letter form
That is what I figured out 3 months ago, and have been trying unsuccessfully to find someone for the last week to let me look at theirs before my lawyer starts the affidavit process. can't find anyone willing to black out their personal info so I can look at it. Been very frustrating.
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 210
Question: have you been in touch with any of the lawyers at the Bureau of Pensions Advocates? They know the system better than a private solicitor, and better yet, provide free legal advice and representation.
I fail to comprehend based on the little you have told us why you have engaged a private solicitor, who does not know the system, and could be leading you down a financially backbreaking path.
I fail to comprehend based on the little you have told us why you have engaged a private solicitor, who does not know the system, and could be leading you down a financially backbreaking path.
I am trying to get the original signed document verified by VAC that it was sent from them and signed by their adjudicator. they won't verify the signed documents, have no copies on file of the signature, and I am will not use a pension advocate lawyer simply because I have already caught VA corrupting many doctors for my testing. pension lawyers are already trying to find out who my private lawyer is and I won't tell them. I already hired a second lawyer from a different firm as a backup in case my lawyer is corrupted by VA. They are trying to cover up their fraud at all costs. money is not an issue.
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 410
Sounds like an awful lot of effort / money / trouble because you can't take "no" for an answer.
Honestly, I am with BB17 on this - is it all based on mistrust of the system? Please do not attempt to martyr yourself on our behalf. Tying up an already taxed system because "money is not an issue" is actually doing the exact opposite.
I want to understand, but you are talking in conspiracy circles (hiring a backup law firm just in case my primary lawyer whom I hired myself is corrupt...) Do you hear yourself?
Honestly, I am with BB17 on this - is it all based on mistrust of the system? Please do not attempt to martyr yourself on our behalf. Tying up an already taxed system because "money is not an issue" is actually doing the exact opposite.
I want to understand, but you are talking in conspiracy circles (hiring a backup law firm just in case my primary lawyer whom I hired myself is corrupt...) Do you hear yourself?
Also, I am not doing a review. I am taking the adjudicator to civil court to verify her signature and to verify that this is her adjudication.this adjudicator probably did a proper fair adjudication and Va has taken the signature page and put with an unfair adjudication so they don't have to pay me the other 3/4 million and make me fight for something I should have already been given fairly. When I take the adjudicator to court that will tell all if the adjudication is fraudulent or not.
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 210
"3/4 million"?
Say again your last, over.
$750,000?!
The max payment under the current rate tables is less than half that (strictly NVC talking). I am obviously not including the other benefits and programs available.
Something isn't lining up here.
Say again your last, over.
$750,000?!
The max payment under the current rate tables is less than half that (strictly NVC talking). I am obviously not including the other benefits and programs available.
Something isn't lining up here.
This isn't a conspiracy theory, I have 6 primary claims, and about 20 secondary claims. All have been proven for me by the Canadian government. There are 3 Australian Korean war veterans studies that prove that these conditions have been caused by the chemical exposure in korea. As Canada accepted the Australian studies because they didn't want to spend the money on their own, they proved for all veterans of korea that the cause is from these chemicals. As long as they don't find any contradictory medical evidence in your medical files which they have not, they have to pay you on the benefit of doubt. This is why you look on VAC website and only 2 Australian studies are listed telling of the medical conditions that are covered and VAC has removed the other so Vets can't find it. The one missing has diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, hypertention, but I got all the info from other vets to prove all this. Conspiracy
theory, what a joke.
theory, what a joke.
And you wonder why my adjudication has been sabotaged with over 15 intentional mistakes,and I know that no adjudicator is going to sign their name to this because they are liable in civil court. The signature on my adjudication was put on a seperate page for this reason, as a new
sabotaged adjudication was made up and the original signature page was added to that adjudication.
I will post my results for the court decision and the full story soon so others can look at their adjudications to see if this has been done to them and what they can do about it.
sabotaged adjudication was made up and the original signature page was added to that adjudication.
I will post my results for the court decision and the full story soon so others can look at their adjudications to see if this has been done to them and what they can do about it.
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 410
Sir,
Do not confuse my misgivings regarding your ramblings as being disrespectful - I have know many people stricken with a touch of a mental disorder to still be sick. Your theory of government corruption is where I place my conspiracy rope. I have zero doubt you are ill, have been ill and could get even more ill.
But spare me the "money is no object" rhetoric and the Canadian taxpayers owe you. Go tie up the Australian government or the Korean government. And stop eliciting hard working, respectable Canadian soldiers to fly to your aid because we are having a difficult time with a department that has been established - ironically thanks to veterans like you - for soldiers like me.
Veterans Affairs may have their issues, but they have bent over backwards to help us - not to be told that they are our to get you...
Do not confuse my misgivings regarding your ramblings as being disrespectful - I have know many people stricken with a touch of a mental disorder to still be sick. Your theory of government corruption is where I place my conspiracy rope. I have zero doubt you are ill, have been ill and could get even more ill.
But spare me the "money is no object" rhetoric and the Canadian taxpayers owe you. Go tie up the Australian government or the Korean government. And stop eliciting hard working, respectable Canadian soldiers to fly to your aid because we are having a difficult time with a department that has been established - ironically thanks to veterans like you - for soldiers like me.
Veterans Affairs may have their issues, but they have bent over backwards to help us - not to be told that they are our to get you...
- Status
Similar threads
