• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Drone flies into back of LAV

Spencer100

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
2,179
Points
1,040
Here is something interesting. 

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/32133/help-us-decipher-this-mystery-footage-of-a-suicide-drone-flying-up-an-armored-vehicles-ramp

What LAV is it?  Could it be a Saudi?
 
Pretty sure it is KSA, LAV is turreted and beside it is one of the 4x4 vehicles the Saudi have bought in large numbers.
 
Spencer100 said:
. . . -mystery-footage-of-a-suicide-drone-flying-up-an-armored-vehicles-ramp . . .

It is interesting footage, but while some will question the use of "drone" to describe a remotely piloted vehicle my frustration with the twisting of the English language rises on this example of using "suicide".  Who committed suicide?
 
Blackadder1916 said:
It is interesting footage, but while some will question the use of "drone" to describe a remotely piloted vehicle my frustration with the twisting of the English language rises on this example of using "suicide".  Who committed suicide?

I'd call it a guided missile at that point
 
Note the range display. Starting about 217 metres from “target”.  That implies some sort of target designation feature in the operators suite. Is that something typically available on a commercial or consumer drone?
 
Not to my knowledge, however they may have over written the code that allows commercial drones to follow a target using image lock. Such as this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtOXwzzsjME
 
I wonder about a system like "Trophy" can take out or defend against this type of thing?
 
A short ranged MG based system could deal with it, they aren't moving fast. I wonder if an optic scanner would work as a targeting system? That would avoid RF transmissions. 
 
How 'bout something like this?

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2018/09/19/the-corps-just-slapped-a-counter-drone-system-on-an-mrzr-all-terrain-vehicle/
 
Eye In The Sky said:
How 'bout something like this?

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2018/09/19/the-corps-just-slapped-a-counter-drone-system-on-an-mrzr-all-terrain-vehicle/

Not sure how it defeats the drone/UAV/whatever, and likely the how and how far is Opsec, but if the drone is image locked, it may not require any outside guidance.
 
Eye In The Sky said:
How 'bout something like this?

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2018/09/19/the-corps-just-slapped-a-counter-drone-system-on-an-mrzr-all-terrain-vehicle/

How about a cam net?

Seriously. People might be overthinking a solution.
 
SeaKingTacco said:
How about a cam net?

Seriously. People might be overthinking a solution.

How about standing up 'RAPTORFORCE'?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAYVyj6vf3Y

:nod:
 
SeaKingTacco said:
How about a cam net?

Sometimes yes, sometimes no.  I've tracked pers on IR from pretty high up on with an MX-20.  Can't leave a cam net over all your footprints, as an example. 

Seriously. People might be overthinking a solution.

Sometimes...
 
Eye In The Sky said:
Sometimes yes, sometimes no.  I've tracked pers on IR from pretty high up on with an MX-20.  Can't leave a cam net over all your footprints, as an example. 

Sometimes...

Yes, there is that aspect, I grant you. I was more getting at this: if you halt for more than x minutes, the cam net goes up (like the old days). Even the old cold war cam nets would capture a commercial grade RPAS pretty neatly. Even if it is set to go off on impact, you still cannot be talking a very big payload and you are unlikely to get much (if any) effect against an armoured vehicle. Sometimes, a simple, 80% solution is the best.

Oh yeah: air sentry. Start using them again, and maybe give him/her a shotgun.
 
SKT: you’re a downer. Some people were hoping for a little wrist action spider thread. Now all they have is the wrist and the potential for aught buck load.
 
SeaKingTacco said:
Yes, there is that aspect, I grant you. I was more getting at this: if you halt for more than x minutes, the cam net goes up (like the old days). Even the old cold war cam nets would capture a commercial grade RPAS pretty neatly. Even if it is set to go off on impact, you still cannot be talking a very big payload and you are unlikely to get much (if any) effect against an armoured vehicle. Sometimes, a simple, 80% solution is the best.

Oh yeah: air sentry. Start using them again, and maybe give him/her a shotgun.

Ahh, I copy where you were goin' now.  Sorry.  Cam nets...those were work!  Do people still do that??
 
Eye In The Sky said:
Ahh, I copy where you were goin' now.  Sorry.  Cam nets...those were work!  Do people still do that??

We should. That goes for helmets too but, you know, 'Operator Cool' sometimes trumps battlefield demands :)
 
Back
Top