- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 410
On TV today an American show talked about mortgages and the different rights between first and second mortgages that owners have.
Situation: According to laws in most (but not all) US states, those who own their residence by way of a first mortgage have some protection from creditors in that the creditor cannot force the owner to sell their house in order to pay off a debt. However, if the owner has a second mortgage, the residence owner loses this protection, and creditors can force the owners to sell their property/residence in order to collect on owed money.
Question: Is this true in Canada as well? Does someone have some insight into this protection or lack thereof?
Context: Although Ive been a homeowner for almost 20 years, Ive never heard of this 'protection'. It seems to me that if homeowners in Canada do have this protection, then many people are unaware that consolidating your assets and organizing your finances by using a second mortgage actually make a person more vulnerable to hostile credit actions.
Ive tried the same search phrases for Canadian law examples, but dont get any results close to a satisfactory answer. Does someone here have some knowledge of the subject and can confirm/deny whether Canadian homeowners have this protection or if its just centric to the US?
Situation: According to laws in most (but not all) US states, those who own their residence by way of a first mortgage have some protection from creditors in that the creditor cannot force the owner to sell their house in order to pay off a debt. However, if the owner has a second mortgage, the residence owner loses this protection, and creditors can force the owners to sell their property/residence in order to collect on owed money.
Question: Is this true in Canada as well? Does someone have some insight into this protection or lack thereof?
Context: Although Ive been a homeowner for almost 20 years, Ive never heard of this 'protection'. It seems to me that if homeowners in Canada do have this protection, then many people are unaware that consolidating your assets and organizing your finances by using a second mortgage actually make a person more vulnerable to hostile credit actions.
Ive tried the same search phrases for Canadian law examples, but dont get any results close to a satisfactory answer. Does someone here have some knowledge of the subject and can confirm/deny whether Canadian homeowners have this protection or if its just centric to the US?