• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Future Helicopters

Separated by….ummm…a brain?
Well I question the brain aspect, based on some of his other comments ;)

Also…


59??? 😆laughs in B-52ese…
View attachment 93304
You are much more knowledgeable on the Hook airframe life - but I would have thought that 59 years is a long time for one of them to still be flying - it sound like they are trying to divest the older ones for newer airframe off the line.

Seeing some of the "upgrades" to the BUFF fleet over the years, it seems that a lot of those airframe have been almost totally rebuilt.
 
Canadian Chinooks acquired in the '70's,sold to the Dutch in the '90's are continuing to fly as aerial firefighters in the states.
1000003889-jpg.93329
1000003888.jpg1000003907.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1000003889.jpg
    1000003889.jpg
    161.1 KB · Views: 131
And sigh…

Not surprising. With FARA cancelled, the investment to re-engine the remaining 64s and 60s to their end of lives is not a very compelling business case.

I wouldn’t send the development engines to the wreckers (a la Avro Arrow of Nimrod Mk4 style), but I wouldn’t put any more money into the program for a bit. See how the no-FARA thing settles out…
 
I'd like to see some of that new defence industrial development money go to these guys:

I’m not sure the design model would be a fit for defense related activities.

Batteries don’t react well to ground fire - so they would require a significant amount of armor to be added that would then hamper the payload.

But it’s an interesting concept regardless.
 
I’m not sure the design model would be a fit for defense related activities.

Batteries don’t react well to ground fire - so they would require a significant amount of armor to be added that would then hamper the payload.

But it’s an interesting concept regardless.
Though @calculus 's article just spun up an interesting idea - I am very curious about one of those as a OWUAS, as the batteries can make a hell of a secondary incendiary on top of the payload.
 
Old kit not dead yet.... again?

Earlier I posted about the Ukrainians finding uses for 105mm towed L119 light guns.
Now, it seems, that they have decided there is a use for the helicopters that had been written off as unsuitable for front line use.

They are now repurposing them as drone interceptors.


....

1760481972020.jpeg1760482151123.jpeg


So an AH-1Z and an AH-64, as well as the UH-60, can all carry four pods of 19 70mm rockets. Loaded with APKWS successfully being employed against Shahed type UAVs and cruise missiles from trucks and fast movers like F16s and F18s they would make an interesting local air interceptor force.

A flight of 3 parked in a parking lot anywhere would represent 228 potential Shahed kills.

How many pods can a Griffon lift?
 
Old kit not dead yet.... again?

Earlier I posted about the Ukrainians finding uses for 105mm towed L119 light guns.
Now, it seems, that they have decided there is a use for the helicopters that had been written off as unsuitable for front line use.

They are now repurposing them as drone interceptors.


....

View attachment 96219View attachment 96220


So an AH-1Z and an AH-64, as well as the UH-60, can all carry four pods of 19 70mm rockets. Loaded with APKWS successfully being employed against Shahed type UAVs and cruise missiles from trucks and fast movers like F16s and F18s they would make an interesting local air interceptor force.

A flight of 3 parked in a parking lot anywhere would represent 228 potential Shahed kills.

How many pods can a Griffon lift?
There are larger pods than the 19 pack.
As well the early Cobra only took 2/stub wing but the later Apache’s could do 4
Some of the DAP’s had well over 100 on each side using the LAU-61, which would have been 6-8 on the wing pieces.

Also given that Arnold Defense makes 23 packs that have been bought for a while by SOCOM. I suspect there is probably a method to put 4 or more of those underwing even though they aren’t technically helicopter pods.


Realistically weight isn’t a huge issue for them, the LAU-61 Digital Launcher is 205lbs / pod unloaded.


However I’m not sure that using rockets is the most cost effective method of downing SUAS, as gun system are going to be a fraction of the cost / round.
 
There are larger pods than the 19 pack.
As well the early Cobra only took 2/stub wing but the later Apache’s could do 4
Some of the DAP’s had well over 100 on each side using the LAU-61, which would have been 6-8 on the wing pieces.

Also given that Arnold Defense makes 23 packs that have been bought for a while by SOCOM. I suspect there is probably a method to put 4 or more of those underwing even though they aren’t technically helicopter pods.


Realistically weight isn’t a huge issue for them, the LAU-61 Digital Launcher is 205lbs / pod unloaded.


However I’m not sure that using rockets is the most cost effective method of downing SUAS, as gun system are going to be a fraction of the cost / round.

Aren't F16s and F18s armed with guns? And yet they seem happy to adopt the APKWS in the CUAS role.
 
Aren't F16s and F18s armed with guns? And yet they seem happy to adopt the APKWS in the CUAS role.
I was more talking about a Geopard like system.

The 20mm M61 Vulcan on the F16/18’s isn’t ideal and doesn’t have the FCS to track the system as well as dedicated AD systems.
 
IIRC the Apache has the original M230 30x113 while the Viper has a 3 barrel 20 mm Gatling?

And the UH-60 has no inherent gun but can lift various.
 
Back
Top