How much ET&E is still being done though? How far is Airbus into the Certification program and AETE in the Qualification program?
Plane is done with OT&E. IOC 1 May at QQ.
Plane has been holding SAR Stby for months now - just not officially until 1 May.
That CTV article is garbage.
Get more Hercs is the best solution. It can stay on station, parts and training are already in the system, the ultimate multi role aircraft. No more orphan fleet that can’t do its job. Stop wasting time and money on failure. How many times do we need to repeat this.
Cyclone
LSVW
TAPV
Griffon
Could this aircraft do what was required during Boxtop 22?
There's a SAR Herc variant, the HC-130J, and another version, the Combat King II that can perform air to air refueling.In principle I agree with you.
@Zoomie can likely explain why the JHerc wasn’t the preference for all of SAR fixed wing tasks.
As I understood it, it was more $, and larger than required for many SAR functions. Plus the sensor suite desired would have made the JHerc SAR birds rather dedicated birds that one wouldn’t want to necessarily task for routine transport.
Not being a Pilot or a SARTech, I couldn’t tell you what the main requirements are for a SAR bird in this situation.
I found a video that appears to show the tail, around the 55 second mark: https://mediaassets.airbus.com/medias/domain38/media102414/724359-kenj497l5n-480.mp4Friend of mine attended the Paris airshow, and said that Airbus had a Kingfisher on display. I've scoured the social media posts for evidence of this, but couldn't find anything. If true, it would seem Airbus is not bothered by the controversy around this platform here in Canada.
Probably but the entire move was political from the get go. Not to mention the governments plans for the CAF at the time.Would the HC-130J Combat King be a better option?
That seems a great argument if the missing person is in Northern BC but what about the poor bastard down 200 miles west of Rankin Inlet? He's at the extreme end of the range. What time would the Kingfisher have on station then? They can find them faster, definitely, provided they can get there to find them.The sensor suite has always been what is trotted out as the reason the aircraft can have less range and on STA time because they can locate the missing pers that much quicker. I was doubtful of this until I spoke to someone who was on a recent SAREX and saw the capabilities first hand. They found the primary and secondary targets well before any other of the airframes competing, if they found them at all, and a third target that was meant to be a surprise for the SAR techs on the ground and thought to be unseen from the sky.
Had we bought the C27J, would it not come with the same sensor package?The sensor suite has always been what is trotted out as the reason the aircraft can have less range and on STA time because they can locate the missing pers that much quicker. I was doubtful of this until I spoke to someone who was on a recent SAREX and saw the capabilities first hand. They found the primary and secondary targets well before any other of the airframes competing, if they found them at all, and a third target that was meant to be a surprise for the SAR techs on the ground and thought to be unseen from the sky.
Bidders offered a complete solution; I don't know what sensor suite the C27J consortium was offering.Had we bought the C27J, would it not come with the same sensor package?
One reason to have Draft RFP’s to take industry feedback and make the best option at the end of the day be an industry driven one.Bidders offered a complete solution; I don't know what sensor suite the C27J consortium was offering.