• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'

More on my favourite 70mm rockets.



One launcher with multiple tubes.
One rocket per tube.

Rocket plus warhead plus point detonating fuze is a low cost ballistic artillery round comparable to a 105 howtzer in effect.

Rocket plus 12000 USD laser guidance plus warhead plus point detonating fuse is a guided anti-tank / anti-structure weapon.

Rocket plus 12000 USD laser guidance plus warhead plus proximity fuze is an anti-aircraft / cuas guided missile.

And then you can start playing with programmable fuzes and air bursts and swapping HE for flechettes, smoke, illumination....
 
And the Koreans have...

A surface to surface, anti ship, fire and forget variant with an 8 km range based on an IR seeker.

 
Sweden is coming up with something with Spider Web type attacks in mind, kinetic micro missiles.

 
And at the low end of the scale - a ballistic computer for the infanteer.

Track the target and squeeze and hold the trigger. The computer will decide when to fire and actually release the firing pin.

That idea was fielded on a hunting rifle about a decade ago. I gave the simulator version a try at SHOT.
 
That idea was fielded on a hunting rifle about a decade ago. I gave the simulator version a try at SHOT.

How did you find it?

I was wondering how it might work with more conventional targets. Does it make it easier for a rookie to effectively engage static targets by minimizing shake and flinch for example? How about engaging running targets?
 
How did you find it?

I was wondering how it might work with more conventional targets. Does it make it easier for a rookie to effectively engage static targets by minimizing shake and flinch for example? How about engaging running targets?
None of them do a great job.

The only setup where they can help the shooter is a stabilized system which are unbelievably bulky for small arms.

As much as they can help already decent shooters the disturbed reticle generally tends to make experienced shooters start to chase it, and so they have their own learning curves.

I’d stick to conventional optics at this juncture.
 
The last few posts have dealt with the low end of the air defence spectrum.
This article goes some way towards demonstrating the complexities associated with the IAMD (Integrated Air and Missile Defence) role being mooted for the DoC (Defence of Canada) Division. i am going to guess that it will be a full time job.


Chemring's primary business seems to be in providing mortar launched counter measures for ships.
 
Why the Ukrainians are going through 70mm rockets like crazy:

1760127892487.gif


1760129372883.png

"While the baseline VAMPIRE (which stands for Vehicle-Agnostic Modular Palletized ISR Rocket Equipment) is a land-based system, the expanded family of systems includes additional specialized variants for maritime, airborne, and electronic warfare operations. Once again, the primary role remains defeating drones — although it should be noted that Ukraine has also used its VAMPIRE systems to attack targets on the ground, too. Potentially, the system has also been used to down Russian cruise missiles, as well."


 
Last edited:
How did you find it?

I was wondering how it might work with more conventional targets. Does it make it easier for a rookie to effectively engage static targets by minimizing shake and flinch for example? How about engaging running targets?
You select a visual image of the target, then hold the trigger until it senses the rifle is lined up with that image. I suspect it failed in real world applications as the Buck moves behind foliage, you can see it, but the imager can't match the image and you have to start again.
 
Back
Top