• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'

And Thales with a truck-mounted SMART-L radar claiming 5000 km range.


That is quite impressive if it can actually get that kind of range.

For comparison, the AN/TPY-2 can see out to around 870-3000km depending on the mode.
 
Last edited:
It's an interesting time in both UAS and CUAS systems. This one is still a bit pricey CUAS at $10,000 to shoot down a $400 UAS at ranges of "more than 1,000 metres."

🍻

CUAS continues to be a domestic issue in the US


The U.S. Department of War has selected five military bases across the United States to field high-energy laser and high-power microwave systems in an operational counter-drone defense pilot program,

Fort Huachuca, Fort Bliss, Naval Base Kitsap, Grand Forks Air Force Base, and Whiteman Air Force Base


Another disadvantage of crewed, fixed wing aircraft: long runways = long perimeters.
 

Does it also mean pressure on large airfields and bases at home as well?

As the article in the post above noted, the USAF is having difficulty defending its home bases from drones.

...


These all have the advantage of not requiring a runway - smaller foot print, shorter perimeter, easier to defend.
 

Morfius - a fly-by EMP drone? It flies close to attacking and fries their innards - 50 pulses per flight?

Also..

"the company has modified Hellfire missiles — traditionally used as air-to-ground weapons on Apache helicopters — into lower-cost ground-to-air interceptors capable of taking down enemy drones."

The APKWS II started life as a lower cost replacement for the Hellfire in the Air to Ground role.
Now Lockheed seems to be trying to get some of that market back.
 

So the US Army Air Defense Layer Cake now looks like

THAAD
Patriot

NASAMs - AIM120D AMRAAM

IFPC - AIM9X Sidewinder, AGM114L Hellfire ....

Avenger - Stinger, NGI

VAMPIRE - APKWS II

IonStrike -

Coyote -

MSHORAD - 30mm LRF Bushmaster

With more on the way....

Then there is all that Navy stuff.
 
GBAD CUAS battle for fixed installations


Decoys


Microwaves


Lasers


Non-Explosive Interceptor Drones (Optionally armed with explosive warheads)


Kinetic Missiles


Point Defence Machine Guns AI Directed

 
Locally paired with


And integrated into (example of higher control only)

 
CV9035s as part of a layered CUAS programme.

I'm taking this article with a large grain of salt. There's a vast difference as to the air defence capability of the 35mm gun system on a CV9035 and those of the 30 or 35mm guns that are part of the Skyranger system.

Colour me sceptical.

🍻
 
I'm taking this article with a large grain of salt. There's a vast difference as to the air defence capability of the 35mm gun system on a CV9035 and those of the 30 or 35mm guns that are part of the Skyranger system.

Colour me sceptical.

🍻
While different guns, do they not both use the same 35mm x 228mm ammo? Rheinmetall says the AHEAD ammo is compatible with the Bushmaster gun. Would it not be more a matter of updating fire control systems if needed? You'd also need to tie the IFVs into your air defence picture if you're incorporating them into the broader air defence plan as opposed to just self defence against inbound drones.
 
While different guns, do they not both use the same 35mm x 228mm ammo? Rheinmetall says the AHEAD ammo is compatible with the Bushmaster gun. Would it not be more a matter of updating fire control systems if needed? You'd also need to tie the IFVs into your air defence picture if you're incorporating them into the broader air defence plan as opposed to just self defence against inbound drones.
One of the things about AHEAD ammo is that it's fuze is set at the muzzle by an induction fuze setter. The fuze setting is dependant on data from a radar as to the target range which is then processed by a fire direction system that slews the gun to the target and directs the fuze setting to the fuze setter. None of that is part and parcel to the standard CV9035 gun or Estonia's as far as I know. These vehicles are equipped with Saab's Universal tank and anti-aircraft sight (UTAAS). There's a long article from Saab on it here.

There's no doubt in my mind that you can create a system that duplicates a Skyranger and put it on a CV90 chassis. But that's not what Estonia has. They are using the optical side of UTAAS and maybe some type of proximity fuzed round. The article isn't clear on that. The issue here is the difference between a system that merely gives you an emergency anti-air capability and a system (of the same calibre) built as a primary AA defence tool.

🍻
 
The issue here is the difference between a system that merely gives you an emergency anti-air capability and a system (of the same calibre) built as a primary AA defence tool.

🍻
Not to mention the difference in training required for a dedicated AD system vs ad hoc weapons use against an aerial target.
 
Not sure if this update on the GBAD project has come to folks attention yet so . . . here it is.


As the program has evolved, so too has the terminology. The next three phases of GBAD, previously referred to as Uplift and Enduring Phases 1 and 2, have been simplified to Phase 1 Uplift SHORAD, Phase 2 Enduring SHORAD, and Phase 3 Enduring VSHORAD.
Engagement in 2025 with five potential bidders helped refine the requirements for Phase 1 Uplift, a military-off-the shelf short-range air defence (SHORAD) and counter rocket, artillery and mortar (C-RAM) platform destined for the multinational brigade in Latvia.
The Army is targeting November 2027 for initial operating capability in Latvia, though that could change. The broader GBAD program is among the Army commander’s top priorities and was recently moved under the umbrella of the new Defence Investment Agency (DIA), created by the federal government in October 2025 to streamline military procurement. Becker said it is still too soon to know if DIA involvement will fast-track some or all the remaining three phases, “but we’re very optimistic.”

In anticipation of the first SHORAD system, 4th Artillery Regiment (GS) will stand up a new battery, 119 Air Defence Battery, this summer. “Their personnel will be in place and ready to receive the initial cadre training once we reach contract award,” said Becker. “That was my main concern.”


🍻
 
Back
Top