BKells said:
I stopped reading after the numerous factual and analytical errors in the first paragraph. It's a biased and misinformed article. I wouldn't recommend reading it.
Much more intelligent articles have been posted on this website. This new article does not raise any new issues.
That's strange....I think it's close to 100% accurate, although politically incorrect....which is probably the reason you dislike it so.
Regardless, telling someone NOT to read something is incredibly arrogant. Everyone has their own mind. Even if you disagree with the content of an argument, trying to dissuade people from reading something you don't like is akin to attempted censorship and you should be embarrassed.
Debate is
always good, even when debating issues that are politically incorrect.
There are two additional components I wish the author had hit upon:
1) The looming debt crisis in the United States, how China can now use it as a weapon, and how it could hamstring the United States for decades to come.
2) The rise of Asia as a whole. It's not just China. By 2035 projections I've seen indicate that Asia will surpass both NAFTA and Europe combined and we will have a fundamental rebalancing of global power.
As a final note, I'd like to challenge you to point out the components of the op-ed you disagree with and then provide substantiation of your counterargument. At least at that point we can have a reasoned debate, as opposed to your preferred modus operendi of dismissing the article in its entirety, without even a cursory review.
Hell, if this had been the Middle Ages, you just would've held a book burning. Good work....
Matthew. :
