• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Government hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Well the CPC has no defense plan except the arctic and with all their cuts etc I doubt DND would see any new funding from them, infact i could see them cutting DND.
I don't think anyone in Canadian politics would be able to sell a decrease - internationally it would be crushing.
The Liberal plan would get us to 2.2% in 2029 (or sooner depending on the economy), and likely approaching 2.5% in the 2030's, NDP say 2030 for 2% as well.
I'm not seeing that anywhere in the liberal platform - I see 2% by 2030.
 
A few people have costed whats known and it would point towards around 2.2, if they get creative accounting and include the coast guard 2.5
Canada would have to dramatically alter the role and equipment of the CCG for that to be considered. Something I don’t see the CCG being interested in.

I’m highly skeptical of any Canadian political party promise about the CAF. Decades of disappointment has made me a little cynical.
 
Canada would have to dramatically alter the role and equipment of the CCG for that to be considered. Something I don’t see the CCG being interested in.
The CCG reddit is aflame with "If they make us do this job I'll quit, if I wanted to carry a gun I would have joined the stoopid navy". CCG probably would be better doing undersea infrastructure surviellence given the recent spate of damage in the Baltic for example. Seems right up their alley. Also increase reporting requirements would make them more useful as well.
I’m highly skeptical of any Canadian political party promise about the CAF. Decades of disappointment has made me a little cynical.
There are two things in all the party platforms that surprises me. Actual genuine surprise.

First is that every single party talks about re-arming. All of them, even the Greens (who's defence platform is better than the NDP's, still weird but better).

The second, and this is truly surprising to me. Is that a Canadian Political Party, put in writing, a budgetary commitment for defence (2% spending target) BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION! What? No one ever commits to spending targets that don't require them to be re-elected another time! This is crazy town!
 
Canadians are dead serious. They truly detest the US and everything it stands for.


 
Spain pays the bulk of their troops poverty pay, and Spain is a cheap place to live..

Think either of those things would apply in Canada?
And yet they have sufficient volunteers to join the ranks. A quick look shows that soldiers there earn between 15,400 E to 70,000 E or CAD 24,000 for a private to CAD 110,000 for a general. That's roughly 60% of many of its northern neighbours but roughly 80% of that of France. It's even a higher percentage when calculated with purchasing power parity. Here's a slightly older paper on that.

That's not exactly poverty rates but clearly lower. Albeit it does not explain the full aspect of the level of disparity.

Nonetheless, it leads to a n inevitable conclusion that if we want to bring up the level of equipment in the CAF we need either a) more money; or b) a lower paid workforce or c) a smaller work force. a) and c) are somewhat non starters. b) is equally problematic but can be achieved by adjusting the ratio of full-time to part-time workforce.

🍻
 
And yet they have sufficient volunteers to join the ranks. A quick look shows that soldiers there earn between 15,400 E to 70,000 E or CAD 24,000 for a private to CAD 110,000 for a general. That's roughly 60% of many of its northern neighbours but roughly 80% of that of France. It's even a higher percentage when calculated with purchasing power parity. Here's a slightly older paper on that.

That's not exactly poverty rates but clearly lower. Albeit it does not explain the full aspect of the level of disparity.

Nonetheless, it leads to a n inevitable conclusion that if we want to bring up the level of equipment in the CAF we need either a) more money; or b) a lower paid workforce or c) a smaller work force. a) and c) are somewhat non starters. b) is equally problematic but can be achieved by adjusting the ratio of full-time to part-time workforce.

🍻
Just a question - the pay ratio of private to general in Spain that you posted above is 4.5x. Meaning that a general in Spain (based on the number that you posted above) earns only 4.5times more than a private.

Curious, what is the ratio in the CAF of private to general?
 
Just a question - the pay ratio of private to general in Spain that you posted above is 4.5x. Meaning that a general in Spain (based on the number that you posted above) earns only 4.5times more than a private.

Curious, what is the ratio in the CAF of private to general?
Pte (2), so qualified: $52k
LGen (Basic): $296k

So about 5.7x. CDS is set by OiC, so not as immediately available.

 
The CCG reddit is aflame with "If they make us do this job I'll quit, if I wanted to carry a gun I would have joined the stoopid navy"
Season 9 Ok GIF by Curb Your Enthusiasm


🍻
 
Back
Top