Government wants more secrets kept under wraps longer (forever)
- Thread starter The Bread Guy
- Start date
And when I say that the intelligence officer should maintain complete secrecy, I mean complete with no saving clauses nor exceptional clauses for who usually falter but the Soviet, Cuban, Chinese and French mole. Again documented, MITROKHIN ARCHIVES.
Parti Quebecois and Bloc Quebecois are equally at fault too. According to an international survey, countries that promote the English language has the most number of investments, so numerous that they have to import qualified workers from "Philippines with respect to Singapore". The survey still remains valid. Why? Why would I, a foreign businessman invest in a country whose language I remain ignorant of?" It would hamper office and management efficiency!. Bloc Quebecois and Parti Quebecois refuse to acknowledge the validity of the survey because if Quebec registers a budget deficit, the federal government is there to fill in the void. Besides, sabotaging the economy of Quebec would alienate the voters and vote for them and not for the federal government. "Canadian capitalism does not work", Parti Communiste du Quebec.
- Reaction score
- 6,430
- Points
- 1,260
jimbuller: Welcome to Milnet.ca. A bit more on-topic, please - more reading than posting suggested for now.
Milnet.ca Staff
Milnet.ca Staff
- Reaction score
- 3,105
- Points
- 1,160
It appears that, along with the swallows returning from Capistrano, the loons have returned from Lake Wacky-wacky-woo-woo.
- Reaction score
- 9,834
- Points
- 1,160
What happens when the Shepard steps from the path of righteousness and decides that making a deal with the wolves is more monetarily beneficial than just protecting the sheep?
If there is no accountability how do we catch them?
What about Shepards who are negligent in their duties? If they let their guard down, do something stupid etc.. and your proverbial sheep die as a result how can their be restitution if the Shepard just covers it up and no one knows. Blames someone else.
If there is no accountability how do we catch them?
What about Shepards who are negligent in their duties? If they let their guard down, do something stupid etc.. and your proverbial sheep die as a result how can their be restitution if the Shepard just covers it up and no one knows. Blames someone else.
- Reaction score
- 6,430
- Points
- 1,260
What's the matter? Don't you trust the current systems of internal checks and balances? Just trust the system like the system trusts you ....ObedientiaZelum said:
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
And most remember my friend, they won't act indecisively, hastily, discriminately without evidence to buttress their findings. Examples? Brunet of RCMP, etc. You get to be part of their 'fraternity' by merit. Just look at me. I am a South African black and I decide on very very important issues. No bull!
- Reaction score
- 6,430
- Points
- 1,260
Nice try - off you go, then!classicenglish said:
Milnet.ca Staff
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 14,745
- Points
- 1,160
ObedientiaZelum said:
50 sheep?, no we have always had 49.........
- Reaction score
- 34,293
- Points
- 1,090
Colin P said:50 sheep?, no we have always had 49.........
We've always been at war with Eastasia
KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 27,297
- Points
- 1,260
:facepalm:
Some things need to be secret. How long to do they need to be secret is the issue, as for a true democracy you cannot have blanket secrecy.
One needs to find a balance - somewhere that security methods are not divulged, but at sometime when the people or issues are no longer relevant those should be released, it is part of history and needs to be released to the public to educate the public.
If you believe in a nation of sheep you've already lost and are on the way to a true Police State.
Special Compartmentalized Information release needs to be managed, however a blanket no is not in anyone best interest.
Some things need to be secret. How long to do they need to be secret is the issue, as for a true democracy you cannot have blanket secrecy.
One needs to find a balance - somewhere that security methods are not divulged, but at sometime when the people or issues are no longer relevant those should be released, it is part of history and needs to be released to the public to educate the public.
If you believe in a nation of sheep you've already lost and are on the way to a true Police State.
Special Compartmentalized Information release needs to be managed, however a blanket no is not in anyone best interest.
Similar threads
