- Reaction score
- 11,267
- Points
- 1,160
A Military for a Dangerous New World
Published: November 15, 2008
As president, Barack Obama will face the most daunting and complicated national security challenges in more than a generation — and he will inherit a military that is critically ill-equipped for the task.
......
To protect the nation, the Obama administration will have to rebuild and significantly reshape the military. We do not minimize the difficulty of this task. Even if money were limitless, planning is extraordinarily difficult in a world with no single enemy and many dangers.
........
We believe the military needs the 65,000 additional Army troops and the 27,000 additional marines that Congress finally pushed President Bush into seeking. That buildup is projected to take at least two years; by the end the United States will have 759,000 active-duty ground troops.
That sounds like a lot, especially with the prospect of significant withdrawals from Iraq. But it would still be about 200,000 fewer ground forces than the United States had 20 years ago, during the final stages of the cold war.
........
Every soldier and marine who has served in Iraq or Afghanistan has had real world experience. But the Army’s structure and institutional bias are still weighted toward conventional war-fighting. Some experts fear that, as happened after Vietnam, the Army will in time reject the recent lessons and innovations.
For the foreseeable future, troops must be schooled in counterinsurgency and stability operations as well as more traditional fighting. And they must be prepared to sustain long-term operations.
..........
There are savings to be found — by slowing or eliminating production of hugely expensive aerial combat fighters (like the F-22, which has not been used in the two current wars) and mid-ocean fighting ships with no likely near-term use. The Pentagon plans to spend $10 billion next year on an untested missile defense system in Alaska and Europe. Mr. Obama should halt deployment and devote a fraction of that budget to continued research until there is a guarantee that the system will work.
Source
So the Pentagon screwed up by cutting divisions at the beginning of the Clinton years.
The Pentagon also screwed up by not preparing to successfully fight and win another Vietnam......
Now Obama (assuming the NYT is his mouthpiece) wants to supply a risibly small increase in the number of troops prepared to fight more Iraqs and Vietnams, wars that the administration doesn't want to fight, and funding the force by cutting systems that allow the Pentagon to win the wars it has demonstrated it can win.
Your future.... equipped for wars you won't be allowed to fight and under-equipped for wars you may have to fight.
And Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson never started any wars....


