High Ranking Police Folk Allegedly Behaving Badly

[SeaKingTacco]

That wouldn’t be part of the military justice system nor likely to be referred to in the sentencing. I expect his security clearance was reviewed for cause, and I’m sure his file went to the MP Credentials Review Board.


The sentencing notes he expects to release voluntarily next month.

I would agree and expect that a change of circumstance report was submitted recommending removal of security clearances and his case would automatically go in front of a credential review.

TL;DR- he is screwed.

 

[SeaKingTacco]

Mortgage fraud, an unexplained expensive car, working security at a base that's bringing in TS equipment.

Where's the National security nexus in that?

Nothing to see, here…

 

[Bruce Monkhouse]

So I'm an MP Sgt with 20 years of good service and I'm still subservient to this guy??

 

[Halifax Tar]

So I'm an MP Sgt with 20 years of good service and I'm still subservient to this guy??

You salute the commission not the person Bruce.

But I understand your sentiment.

 

[Jarnhamar]

The transcript refers to the QR&O volume 3 chapter 208 article pertaining to forfeitures, so the fine would be on top of the repayment of pay.

QR&O: Volume III - Chapter 208 Fines, Forfeitures and Deductions - Canada.ca

Queen's Regulations and Orders - QR&O - Chapter 208 - Fines, Forfeitures and Deductions

www.canada.ca

208.30 – FORFEITURES – OFFICERS AND NON-COMMISSIONED MEMBERS​

(1) Subject to paragraph (2), one day's forfeiture shall be imposed upon an officer or non-commissioned member for each day the member is:

(a) absent without leave when the member has been found guilty of that offence;

My read of that is the forfeiture is administrative in nature and not disciplinary.

Since the captain was found guilty of AWOL he should forfeit 1 day of pay for every day he was AWOL.

Afterwards he should be hit with punishments. Correct? Hopefully that happened.

 

[dapaterson]

My read of that is the forfeiture is administrative in nature and not disciplinary.

Since the captain was found guilty of AWOL he should forfeit 1 day of pay for every day he was AWOL.

Afterwards he should be hit with punishments. Correct? Hopefully that happened.

Correct. So his unit should have had the WOR initiate the forfeiture. Hopefully before the end of the taxation year.

 

[dapaterson]

So I'm an MP Sgt with 20 years of good service and I'm still subservient to this guy??

Subordinate, not subservient.

 

[Bruce Monkhouse]

You salute the commission not the person Bruce.

But I understand your sentiment.

Subordinate, not subservient.

I guess I was going for the 'integrity' thing more, as in, I"m listening to you lay out orders when all that's in my head is "How the h#$l are you still wearing the same cap badge as me?"

 

[Halifax Tar]

I guess I was going for the 'integrity' thing more, as in, I"m listening to you lay out orders when all that's in my head is "How the h#$l are you still wearing the same cap badge as me?"

Like I said I understand your sentiment.

 

[lenaitch]

Mortgage fraud, an unexplained expensive car, working security at a base that's bringing in TS equipment.

Where's the National security nexus in that?

An offshore 'influence' that turned an offer he couldn't refuse into one he couldn't live with?

Choices have consequences.