daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 31,882
- Points
- 1,160
Meanwhile the CAF be like:
For sure. Goose/Gander. If other sports have significant enough poorly addresses conduct issues as to necessitate federal funding to be contingent on oversight, have at ‘er.It has been said here but to reiterate every sport has its issues - look at gymnastics in the USA.
Indeed every organization has its predators - we all know that. Hockey is in the spotlight right now and next month it might be some other organization.
There is a similar program with Hockey Canada (Respect in Sport) that all parents, players, volunteers, coaches, referees and officials need to take, and Hockey Canada also requires a background check.View attachment 71558USA Hockey
www.usahockey.com
USAHockey has the SafeSport program that all volunteers, Coaches, Referees and sport bodies need to conduct training under and fallow reporting processes, In addition to State, and Federal laws.
Tools are but one factor. Culture, to use such tools or not, is another.There is a similar program with Hockey Canada (Respect in Sport) that all parents, players, volunteers, coaches, referees and officials need to take, and Hockey Canada also requires a background check.
Agreed. This was partly my point that even with a program, abuses still happened.Tools are but one factor. Culture, to use such tools or not, is another.
The CAF had OP HONOUR…
Not to mention, when you look at who they retained to complete that investigative report, and infer the likely motives and contents, it's pretty likely that the release of the report would be a public relations bombshell of biblical proportions.So, I was unfamiliar with this til I saw it reported on today. To my initial understanding, Hockey Canada basically was directed to fully disclose a third party investigative report into an alleged gang rape at one of their events to a parliamentary committee. They declined to, were given further opportunity to comply, and continued to not do so. They have also declined to sign on to a federal oversight body, so now they’re losing a few million dollars in federal funding?
I mean… if that reasonably sums it up, I don’t really take issue with with funding being withheld. They want federal money, cool. It’s reasonable for some oversight and governance to come with that.
Because no matter how many DLN courses, programs, or taxes are imposed on a people, some people will still be bad people.Agreed. This was partly my point that even with a program, abuses still happened.
Only Nixon could go to China.Tools are but one factor. Culture, to use such tools or not, is another.
The CAF had OP HONOUR…
For sure. Goose/Gander. If other sports have significant enough poorly addresses conduct issues as to necessitate federal funding to be contingent on oversight, have at ‘er.
I’ve heard that too. I’m just reasonably sure rape is outside the tolerated arcs.I know a few athletes who operated at the International/ Olympic level for years and they told me some pretty blood chilling stories.
My key takeaway: if you want success in athletics, you're going to have to be prepared to encounter alot of 'child abuse'.
Kind of like my old mob
View attachment 71576
I’ve heard that too. I’m just reasonably sure rape is outside the tolerated arcs.
Sad but true add ...... People will tolerate some amazing things in the vanishingly small chance that a Canadian kid will medal at an Olympics/make it into the NHL-CFL-insert professional league of choice here ....
It can’t just be a program to check the box.There is a similar program with Hockey Canada (Respect in Sport) that all parents, players, volunteers, coaches, referees and officials need to take, and Hockey Canada also requires a background check.