- Reaction score
- 8,202
- Points
- 1,360
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2005/05/26/1057533-ap.htm
French voters reject the EU constitution in major blow to Chirac
By JOHN LEICESTER
PARIS (AP) - French voters rejected the European Union's first constitution Sunday, a stinging repudiation of President Jacques Chirac's leadership and the ambitious, decades-long effort to further unite the Continent.
Chirac, who had urged voters to approve the charter, announced the result in a brief, televised address. He said the process of ratifying the treaty would continue in other EU countries.
"It is your sovereign decision, and I take note," Chirac said. "Make no mistake, France's decision inevitably creates a difficult context for the defence of our interests in Europe."
With nearly 96 per cent of votes counted, "No" had 55.5 per cent, with only 44.5 per cent for "Yes," the Interior Ministry said.
The treaty's rejection in a bitterly contested referendum in France - the architect of the European project - could set the Continent's plans back by years and amounts to a personal humiliation for the veteran French leader.
Treaty opponents chanting "We won!" gathered at Place de la Bastille, a symbol of rebellion where angry crowds in 1789 stormed the prison and sparked the French Revolution. Cars blared their horns and "No" campaigners thrust their arms into the air.
"This is a great victory," said Fabrice Savel, 38, from the working-class suburb of Aubervilliers. He was distributing posters that read: "No to a free-market Europe."
EU leaders in Brussels, Belgium, vowed to continue their effort to have the constitution approved.
All 25 EU members must ratify the text for it to take effect as planned by Nov. 1, 2006. Nine already have done so: Austria, Hungary, Italy, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.
The Dutch vote Wednesday, with polls showing opposition to the constitution there running at about 60 per cent. On Friday, the constitution's main architect, former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, said countries that reject the treaty will be asked to vote again.
France's was the first "No" - even though it was a founder member of what over 50 years has grown into the EU.
"There is no more constitution," said Philippe de Villiers, a leading opponent. "It is necessary to reconstruct Europe on other foundations that don't currently exist."
De Villiers called on Chirac to resign - something the French leader had said he would not do - and called for parliament to be dissolved.
Jean-Marie Le Pen, the extreme-right leader who campaigned vigorously for the constitution's defeat, also called for Chirac's resignation.
Chirac "wanted to gamble . . . and he has lost," Le Pen said, alluding to Chirac's decision not to submit the charter to sure approval by parliament. The EU constitution can be adopted either by a referendum or a country's legislature.
The French vote came three days before the charter faces another hostile reception in the Netherlands.
Chirac and European leaders have said there was no fallback plan in the event of a French rejection. But many French voters did not believe that. Many, especially on the left, hoped their "No" vote would force the EU back to the drawing board and improve the 448-clause document. In the meantime, "No" voters expected the EU to continue functioning under existing treaties.
The outcome caused immediate disarray, with political leaders outside France divided on the significance of the French vote.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said "the result raises profound questions for all of us about the future direction of Europe."
But the European Union's industry commissioner, Guenther Verheugen, said the vote was not a catastrophe and that the situation should not be over dramatized.
"Integration will continue," Verheugen said.
Chirac had waged an all-out campaign to persuade nearly 42 million sharply divided voters to approve the charter. But the electorate was in rebellious mood, with unemployment running at 10 per cent and wide unease about the direction Europe is taking.
Turnout was close to 70 per cent - testifying to the passions that the treaty and the debate surrounding it aroused.
Nicolas Sarkozy, the head of Chirac's ruling Union for a Popular Movement and a leading campaigner for the "Yes" camp, called Sunday's defeat "a major political event."
Looking ahead to France's next general elections in 2007, Sarkozy said: "We must decide on an innovative, courageous and ambitious plan of action."
Chirac's popularity ratings have plummeted in recent weeks, and in his television address, the president said he would announce "my decisions concerning the government and its priorities" in coming days.
Although Chirac argued that the constitution would streamline EU decision-making and make the bloc more accessible to its 450 million citizens, opponents feared it would strip France of its sovereignty and generous social system and trigger an influx of cheap labour. On the left, opponents feared that the treaty would open the EU to unfettered free-market capitalism, trampling on workers rights.
In the end, though, the French - torn between wanting to remain one of the engines of an increasingly competitive Europe yet fiercely protective of the generous social welfare benefits they enjoy - stuck with their perceptions that the charter posed another threat to their cherished way of life.
This is good news for fortress North America as I see it, keeping us competitive in the "game" of finances.
French voters reject the EU constitution in major blow to Chirac
By JOHN LEICESTER
PARIS (AP) - French voters rejected the European Union's first constitution Sunday, a stinging repudiation of President Jacques Chirac's leadership and the ambitious, decades-long effort to further unite the Continent.
Chirac, who had urged voters to approve the charter, announced the result in a brief, televised address. He said the process of ratifying the treaty would continue in other EU countries.
"It is your sovereign decision, and I take note," Chirac said. "Make no mistake, France's decision inevitably creates a difficult context for the defence of our interests in Europe."
With nearly 96 per cent of votes counted, "No" had 55.5 per cent, with only 44.5 per cent for "Yes," the Interior Ministry said.
The treaty's rejection in a bitterly contested referendum in France - the architect of the European project - could set the Continent's plans back by years and amounts to a personal humiliation for the veteran French leader.
Treaty opponents chanting "We won!" gathered at Place de la Bastille, a symbol of rebellion where angry crowds in 1789 stormed the prison and sparked the French Revolution. Cars blared their horns and "No" campaigners thrust their arms into the air.
"This is a great victory," said Fabrice Savel, 38, from the working-class suburb of Aubervilliers. He was distributing posters that read: "No to a free-market Europe."
EU leaders in Brussels, Belgium, vowed to continue their effort to have the constitution approved.
All 25 EU members must ratify the text for it to take effect as planned by Nov. 1, 2006. Nine already have done so: Austria, Hungary, Italy, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain.
The Dutch vote Wednesday, with polls showing opposition to the constitution there running at about 60 per cent. On Friday, the constitution's main architect, former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, said countries that reject the treaty will be asked to vote again.
France's was the first "No" - even though it was a founder member of what over 50 years has grown into the EU.
"There is no more constitution," said Philippe de Villiers, a leading opponent. "It is necessary to reconstruct Europe on other foundations that don't currently exist."
De Villiers called on Chirac to resign - something the French leader had said he would not do - and called for parliament to be dissolved.
Jean-Marie Le Pen, the extreme-right leader who campaigned vigorously for the constitution's defeat, also called for Chirac's resignation.
Chirac "wanted to gamble . . . and he has lost," Le Pen said, alluding to Chirac's decision not to submit the charter to sure approval by parliament. The EU constitution can be adopted either by a referendum or a country's legislature.
The French vote came three days before the charter faces another hostile reception in the Netherlands.
Chirac and European leaders have said there was no fallback plan in the event of a French rejection. But many French voters did not believe that. Many, especially on the left, hoped their "No" vote would force the EU back to the drawing board and improve the 448-clause document. In the meantime, "No" voters expected the EU to continue functioning under existing treaties.
The outcome caused immediate disarray, with political leaders outside France divided on the significance of the French vote.
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said "the result raises profound questions for all of us about the future direction of Europe."
But the European Union's industry commissioner, Guenther Verheugen, said the vote was not a catastrophe and that the situation should not be over dramatized.
"Integration will continue," Verheugen said.
Chirac had waged an all-out campaign to persuade nearly 42 million sharply divided voters to approve the charter. But the electorate was in rebellious mood, with unemployment running at 10 per cent and wide unease about the direction Europe is taking.
Turnout was close to 70 per cent - testifying to the passions that the treaty and the debate surrounding it aroused.
Nicolas Sarkozy, the head of Chirac's ruling Union for a Popular Movement and a leading campaigner for the "Yes" camp, called Sunday's defeat "a major political event."
Looking ahead to France's next general elections in 2007, Sarkozy said: "We must decide on an innovative, courageous and ambitious plan of action."
Chirac's popularity ratings have plummeted in recent weeks, and in his television address, the president said he would announce "my decisions concerning the government and its priorities" in coming days.
Although Chirac argued that the constitution would streamline EU decision-making and make the bloc more accessible to its 450 million citizens, opponents feared it would strip France of its sovereignty and generous social system and trigger an influx of cheap labour. On the left, opponents feared that the treaty would open the EU to unfettered free-market capitalism, trampling on workers rights.
In the end, though, the French - torn between wanting to remain one of the engines of an increasingly competitive Europe yet fiercely protective of the generous social welfare benefits they enjoy - stuck with their perceptions that the charter posed another threat to their cherished way of life.
This is good news for fortress North America as I see it, keeping us competitive in the "game" of finances.
