- Reaction score
- 20,238
- Points
- 1,260
The C5 wasn’t mobile - it was absolutely impossible to use in a ‘light role’ and requires a tripod. The C6/MAG-58/M240/L7A2 etc on the other hand is decently effective off the bipod in the light role - and quite effective in the SF kit.
Any CarlG sight won’t really work for a Mortar or MG, the C2 let’s you record targets and aim like an Artillery piece for indirect (or at least non directly observed) fire.
WRT your throw back to the Grizzly - the turret was abysmal, and the M2 and C5 (or later C6 coax) wasn’t nearly up to to a M2 in a tripod w/ T&E or a C6 in an SF kit
Plus when you look at the LAV to the AVGP it becomes a joke as the stabilized system on the LAV with the FCS makes the AVGP look like a kids toy.
The entire AVGP fiasco was a clown show and should be just quietly forgotten with a note never to try something as dumb ever again.
Any CarlG sight won’t really work for a Mortar or MG, the C2 let’s you record targets and aim like an Artillery piece for indirect (or at least non directly observed) fire.
WRT your throw back to the Grizzly - the turret was abysmal, and the M2 and C5 (or later C6 coax) wasn’t nearly up to to a M2 in a tripod w/ T&E or a C6 in an SF kit
Plus when you look at the LAV to the AVGP it becomes a joke as the stabilized system on the LAV with the FCS makes the AVGP look like a kids toy.
The entire AVGP fiasco was a clown show and should be just quietly forgotten with a note never to try something as dumb ever again.