FormerHorseGuard
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 422
- Points
- 760
I found this research paper while doing a search, it is a very interesting read. I think it explains a lot of the reasoning behind the lack of tanks, and other armour weapons in the CF. I found it very interesting and educational. Learned some new terms, and some inside jokes ( REECE BY DEATH is a militia term , I want a t shirt) and learned about operations planning and what was planned and what did not go according to plan. Politics, careers, and other reasons we have the LEO C1 and the history of the RCAC .
some of you may have already read this pare but for those who have not. see what you think
http://www.seanmmaloney.com/Ch18RCAC.pdf
i found the various tank replacement programs interesting, lack of money and political will power mostly, training cycles , lack res force training is not a new thing i learned, long term and short term plans for the armoured units. all very interesting
like to hear some feed back after you read it, be warned it is along paper.
some of you may have already read this pare but for those who have not. see what you think
http://www.seanmmaloney.com/Ch18RCAC.pdf
i found the various tank replacement programs interesting, lack of money and political will power mostly, training cycles , lack res force training is not a new thing i learned, long term and short term plans for the armoured units. all very interesting
like to hear some feed back after you read it, be warned it is along paper.